192x Filetype XLSX File size 0.04 MB Source: www.kau.edu.sa
Assessment Rubric for Summer Training Report and Presentation King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Engineering Academic Accreditation Unit Assessment Rubric for Summer Training Report Department of Academic Year: Training Company: Student Name: Evaluator: Item Evaluated 5 3 1 0 weight Score The student’s A simple, clear, brief, positive, and correctly written statement, The statement describes the big picture idea of The statement is ambiguous, does The goal/ mission statement is overall goal/ that describes the "big-picture" idea of why the student is why the student is interested to have the training, not address the training activities, or missing. mission statement interested to have training, what he wants to focus on, and but it is either long, complicated, or contains contains a lot of linguistic errors. 2 for the training what he needs to accomplish. negative elements. n activity o i t c Expected Learning Three or more correctly written learning outcomes that Learning outcomes are specific, measurable, some Learning outcomes are either Learning outcomes are missing, u d outcomes describe specific, measurable, and realistic achievements to realistic and job related but they are either far ambiguous, not sufficiently specific, ambiguous, or contains a lot of o r t accomplish during the training experience. They relate to the away from the student's course of study or do not cannot be achieved within the linguistic errors. n I job, represent the job functions and duties, assist in clearly address the student's overall goal of the training time limit, or cannot be professional growth and development, relate to the student's training experience. evaluated at the end of the 2 course of study or major, and help to reach the overall goal of experience. student's training experience. Historical Correctly written short description of the company/ Historical background is long, taken as is from Historical background is badly Historical background is missing. Background establishment history. the company documentations, or contains written, ambiguous or contains 1 irrelevant data. many linguistic mistakes. Organizational The organizational structure is presented in a clear way and The organizational structure is badly presented. The organizational structure is 1 Structure suitable format. missing. Products/ services The products/ services of the company are clearly described The products/ services of the company are Products/ services are not and compared to similar products/ services in the market. described without being compared to similar mentioned. 1 products/services in the market. Customers Products/ services are associated to their customers and their Customers are mentioned without specifying their Customers are not mentioned. 1 y expected needs. particular needs. n Engineering Units Engineering units are described in details with their functions Only some engineering units are clearly and Engineering units are briefly Engineering units are a p and organizational structure. sufficiently described. mentioned. underestimated or not mentioned m 1 o at all. C e Industrial process The industrial process is fully described, with sufficient photos, The industrial process is shortly, but clearly, The industrial process is No interest is given to describing h T figures, or graphical representations described. ambiguously, or erroneously the industrial process. 1 described. Environmental and The environmental and social impact of the company, its The environmental and social impact of the Only effects on immediate users are Environmental and social social impact products, and its by-products are fully described including company, its products, and its by-products are discussed. impacts are disregarded. immediate and long-term issues involved on users and non- described including widespread effects involved 1 users locally and globally. but with somewhat limited perspective about long-term factors. Quality System The quality system is fully described with sufficient photos, The quality system is shortly, but clearly, The quality system is ambiguously, Quality system is underestimated figures, or graphical representations. described. or erroneously described. or not mentioned at all. 1 12 Page 1/5 Assessment Rubric for Summer Training Report and Presentation King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Engineering Academic Accreditation Unit Assessment Rubric for Summer Training Report Department of Academic Year: Training Company: Student Name: Evaluator: Item Evaluated 5 3 1 0 weight Score Work environment The nature of the activities carried out by the department(s) or The nature of the activities carried out by the The nature of the activities carried The nature of the activities is not unit(s) where the major part of the training experience took department(s) or unit(s) where the major part of out by the department(s) or unit(s) mentioned. t place, is clearly described. Whether the function of the the training experience took place, is clearly where the major part of the training n department is design, maintenance, R&D, project management, described. Nevertheless the unit is viewed as if it experience took place, is e 1 m or anything else, the student is able to relate it to the activities is a stand alone entity. ambiguously, or erroneously n o of the whole company/ establishment. described. r i v n E g Standards, Paper work is clearly described with reference to applicable Paper work is clearly described but no reference Paper work is ambiguously, or Paper work is underestimated or n i n Regulations, and standards and regulations. is made to applicable standards and regulations. erroneously described. not mentioned at all. 1 i a documentations r T e Timeline A time plan of the whole training activity is presented using An attempt is made to develop a work time plan The time plan is inefficient and No time plan is developed. Work h T standard project planning techniques such as Gant charts, but it is either incomplete, unclear, unbalanced, or training days are spent in a non is carried on daily bases deployment charts, and critical path analysis. does not follow standard project planning productive way. 1 techniques. Problem definition The problem to be solved is clearly stated. Objectives are The problem to be solved is described but there are An attempt is made to identify the No mention is made of the problem complete, specific, and concise. Customer needs are correctly minor omissions or vague details. Objectives are problem to be solved but it is to be solved. identified and transformed into project requirements. All potential conceptually correct but may be incomplete, do not described in a confusing manner, customers are identified and their needs are taken into address the needs of all potential customers, or badly objectives are not relevant or contain 3 consideration. transformed into project requirements. technical/ conceptual errors and project requirements are vague or absent. s t c Literature review All pertaining information (including regulations, standards, and Pertaining information are identified and collected Collected information are limited, The students are unable to identify, e j o and data collection operational experiences) are identified and collected from a variety from a variety of credible sources. Information are accessed from incredible or limited access and/or present pertaining r P of credible sources. Information are reviewed and assessed with assessed with respect to their quality, validity or sources or presented without any information in an acceptable / s k respect to their quality, validity and accuracy and presented using a accuracy to a limited extent or presented in a non attempt to assess their quality, validity format 3 s a standard and ethically referenced literature review format. standard format. or accuracy. T d e n g i s Knowledge The problem to be solved is logically formulated. Prior knowledge The problem to be solved is formulated but there are An attempt is made to formulate the Knowledge integration is absent or s A integration with of mathematics, science and engineering principles as well as minor omissions or vague details. An attempt is problem but it is either confusing, or completely erroneous course work discipline related courses and collected information are made to use prior knowledge but it is either conceptually incorrect, with limited 3 successfully integrated to address the problem. incomplete or contains some conceptual errors. use of prior knowledge. Safety and Measures to deal responsibly with both safety issues and Measures presented deal responsibly with only one Measures to deal with both safety and No mention is made of related environmental environmental hazards are presented aspect: either safety issues or environmental hazards environmental hazards are vague, safety or environmental issues. 3 issues incomplete, or insufficient 15 Page 2/5 Assessment Rubric for Summer Training Report and Presentation King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Engineering Academic Accreditation Unit Assessment Rubric for Summer Training Report Department of Academic Year: Training Company: Student Name: Evaluator: Item Evaluated 5 3 1 0 weight Score Work plan An effective work strategy is developed, including a plan of attack, An attempt is made to develop a workable strategy but work strategy is inefficient and the No work strategy is presented; a decomposition of work into subtasks, balanced responsibilities of it is either incomplete, unclear, unbalanced, or does not work plan does not ensure project haphazard approach seems to be team members, an executable timetable and a justified project budget. follow standard project planning techniques. completion on time or within budget. followed, or the student relied on Standard project planning techniques such as Gant charts, instructions from his supervisors. 3 deployment charts, and critical path analysis are used. ) d e u n Economic factors Deep understanding of applied economic factors of related products Good understanding of applied economic factors and Some understanding of applied Little or no understanding of i t n and the impact they may have on the economy at large as well as long how they affect other related products. economic factors. economic factors involved. 3 o C term trends. ( s t Implementation The work carried out represents an engineering contribution similar to The work carried out represents an engineering The work carried out is similar to that No credible hands-on work is c e j that carried by a professional engineer in the field and is well contribution similar to that carried by a professional typically carried by field technicians presented. o r described engineer in the field but it is badly or ambiguously rather than professional engineers. 3 P / described. s k s a Impact analysis Related environmental, social, health and safety issues as well as Related environmental, social, health and safety issues An attempt is made to evaluate the No impact statement is present. T anticipated hazards are deeply evaluated. Local and global, long term as well as anticipated hazards are evaluated with impact of the work but it is either d e n as well as short term benefits and risks on users and non users are minor errors and omissions. incomplete, superficial, or containing 3 g i analyzed and how they might impact the general acceptance of the major conceptual errors. s s A results of the work done. Evaluation Performance of the final work compares favorably to customer Performance of the final work fails to satisfy some Performance of the final work fails to Final work is not evaluated requirements, pre-set outcomes, operational constraints, and existing requirements but deviations are analyzed and satisfy some requirements. Deviations products if any. improvements are proposed. are analyzed but no improvements are 3 proposed. Achievement of The student is able to present convincing evidences that all of his The student fails to satisfy some of his learning The student fails to satisfy some of his Achievement of expected learning s expected learning Learning outcomes were achieved by the end of the training period. outcomes, but this failure is recognized and correctly learning outcomes, failure is recognized outcomes is not reported. n outcomes analyzed. but it is ambiguously or insufficiently 1 o i analyzed. t a d n Recommendations to Analysis of the achievement of the student's learning outcomes are Analysis of the achievement of the student's learning Some general recommendations are No recommendations to enhance the e m enhance future used to develop specific rational recommendations to enhance the outcomes are used to develop recommendations to presented, but they are not clearly future training in this company are m training in this future student's training experience in this company. enhance the future student's training experience in this correlated to the achievement of the presented. o c company company, but some of them are vague, irrational, do student's learning outcomes in the 1 e R not address the real problem, or badly written. present company. & s n o i Recommendations to The student's training experience is used to develop a set of rational, The student's training experience is used to develop Some general recommendations are No recommendations to enhance the s u l enhance future clear and precise recommendations to KAU in order to enhance the recommendations to KAU in order to enhance the presented, but they are not clearly future training f KAU engineering c n training of KAU future training of the engineering students. future training of the engineering students, but some of correlated to the student's training students are presented. o 1 C engineering students them are vague, irrational, do not address the real experience. problem, or badly written. 18 Page 3/5 Assessment Rubric for Summer Training Report and Presentation King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Engineering Academic Accreditation Unit Assessment Rubric for Summer Training Report Department of Academic Year: Training Company: Student Name: Evaluator: Item Evaluated 5 3 1 0 weight Score Presentation of Demonstrate an excellent understanding of all major topics Demonstrate good understanding of the subject Demonstrate some understanding of Demonstrate an ignorance of the technical content presented and argued with clear links between successive ideas matter with its major points stated and argued with the subject matter with main topics topic or its main points, or the using superb organization from a capturing introduction to a clear clear links between successive ideas, but with that are limited, partially covered, points presented are not related, conclusion that builds on and provides support to the subject occasional lack of logical flow from an acceptable incorrectly argued, lack logical flow, not organized, or not appropriately 1 matter. introduction to a reasonable conclusion. weakly introduced, or have a non introduced or concluded. convincing conclusion. Addressing needs of Present information that is readers/audience focused, organized to Demonstrate awareness of the readers/audience Demonstrate some awareness of the Demonstrate ignorance of readers/audience meet their needs, and falls within prescribed size or allocated time needs, respect prescribed size or allocated time and readers/audience needs but may fail to readers/audience or present using engaging techniques to efficiently capture the interest of the occasionally use some engaging techniques . capture their interest and engagement, information that is false, missing or 1 s readers/audience. or fail to respect prescribed size or has an inappropriate technical l allocated time. level. l i k S Visual appeal Present a content that follows standard/prescribed format, that is Present a content that follows standard/prescribed Present a content that follows Present a content that: does not n o free from spelling, grammar, punctuation or pronunciation errors, format, that has few spelling, grammar, punctuation standard/prescribed format, but has follow prescribed format, makes no i t and makes frequent and effective use of fonts, headings, bullets, or pronunciation errors, and makes occasional use of many spelling, grammar, or use of fonts, headings, bullets or a c i margins, and white spaces to enhance the content’s visual appeal fonts, headings, bullets, margins, and white spaces to punctuation errors, or makes minimal white spaces, or has serious n u and increase readability. enhance the content’s visual appeal and increase use of fonts, headings, bullets and problems in English syntax. 1 m readability. white spaces to enhance visual appeal m o and readability. C n e t t i r Graphical Effectively use serially numbered, self contained and well Use serially numbered, self contained and well Present some figures or tables that are Use illustrations that: do not add W communication formatted figures, tables, drawings, or other graphical illustrations formatted graphical illustrations with appropriate not well formatted, not numbered, value to the scientific merit of the skills with appropriate captions that are suitably mentioned and discussed captions, but some of them are not mentioned or uncaptioned, or misplaced. artifact, are used only for 1 to enhance the content discussed. decorative purposes, or are missed when needed. Credibility & Use reliable and credible references/citations that follow standard Use accurate sources that support the credibility of Use few accurate sources, that may Consistently use unreliable authenticity format (IEEE, AIAA, ASME, etc.) to support the credibility and the information presented, but they may include few fail to adequately support the references, do not follow standard authenticity of the information presented without any sort of unreliable references, references that do not follow credibility of the information, present format, or rely upon plagiarism or plagiarism or dishonestly copied material. standard format, or have some sort of plagiarism. many unreliable references or dishonestly copied material. 1 references that do not follow standard format, or have several dishonestly copied material. REPORT SCORE OUT OF 50 ( To succeed the student should obtain 30 or more) 50 0 Page 4/5
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.