185x Filetype PPTX File size 2.26 MB Source: www.irishellas.com
Maxeon Solar Cell Vs. Conventional Solar Cell Maxeon Solar Cell (Back) Conventional Solar Cells (Front) Thick Thin lines of copper-plated baked-on foundation metal paste Soldered copper Strain-relieved ribbons copper bar connecting Ribbons cell-to-cell connect cell-to-cell 1. Thick copper (tin-plated) is robust against corrosion. 1. Very thin screen-printed metal lines on the front of the cell are susceptible to corrosion over time 2. No soldering along the length of the cell 2. High-stress solder joints between the long copper ribbons and 3. Copper bar connecting cells has robust copper-to-copper the crystal solar cell soldering, strain-relief, and double-redundancy. • As the panels get hot in the day and cold at night the copper 4. Solid copper foundation maintains the cell energy production expands but the silicon cell does not. even if the silicon cracks. • Over time, this repeated stress causes cells to crack and solder bonds to break. 3. Single points of failure on copper ribbons between cells. 4. Screen-printed metal paste has no strength to hold the cell together when the silicon cracks Cracked Standard Efficiency Cells in the Field Conventional Panels SunPower Panel r e w o P o N = s a e r a k c a l B Likely damaged in installation Likely damaged from Left side has broken copper Even with a crack, all parts of or from repeated hot/cold poor soldering process and ribbons between a pair of cells. the cell are running (no black). temp cycles hot/cold temp cycles. Conventional panels commonly fail from hot/cold temperature cycles that crack solar cells, solder joints and copper ribbons over time. Common Ways Conventional Solar Cells Degrade Corrosion Cell or Interconnect Breaks Output Lead Problems Junction Box Problems Corrosion Jbox Delamination Cell or 45.3% Overheated Wires, Diodes, Interconnect Terminal Strips Breaks Mechanical Damage 40.7% Defective Bypass Diodes Wohlgemuth, J. “Reliability of PV Systems.” Proceedings of SPIE, Aug, 2008. Unmatched Reliability: Cell or Inter- Unique MaxeonDesign connect Breaks • No cell-to-cell interconnect breakage • Cell cracks have essentially no impact on energy output 105% 100% SunPower (Current) n o i t 95% Conventional Modules a d a r g 90% e D r e 85% w o Certification P Standard 80% 200 Cycles 75% 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Number of Cycles: -40 to 85C (-40 to 185F), 5 cycles per day The unique design of the Maxeon cell makes the Non-SunPower data from Koehl, Michael, et. al. “PV Reliability: Accelerated Aging Tests and Panels impervious to hot/cold temperature cycles. Modeling of Degradation.” Fraunhofer ISE and TUV Rheinland. Presented at EUPVSEC, Valencia Spain, Sept 2010. Unmatched Reliability: Cell or Inter- Unique Maxeon Design connect Breaks • No conventional panel data is available for comparison for the world’s most challenging accelerated test: cycles of hot-and-humid followed by rapid freezing – that design cannot survive. • The certification standard is a challenge for most panels at 10 cycles.1 SunPower panels are almost unaffected after 280 cycles. 100% 90% SunPower (Current) SunPower (Previous) 80% n 70% o i t a d 60% a r For certification testing: “The top 4 g e failure rates for c-Si modules were D 50% r e related to damp heat, thermal cycling, w 40% o Certification humidity freeze and diode tests.”1 P 30% Standard 10 Cycles 20% 10% 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Number of Cycles: -40 to 85C (-40 to 185F) with ice and humidity, 1 cycle per day The unique design of the Maxeon cell makes the Panels impervious to water-freezing cycles. 1 TamizhMani, B. G. “Failure Analysis of Module Design Qualification Testing – III,” 36th IEEE PVSC Conf, 2010.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.