jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Leadership Ppt 74150 | Wrapup2


 130x       Filetype PPT       File size 0.18 MB       Source: www.grips.ac.jp


File: Leadership Ppt 74150 | Wrapup2
key relations leadership critical role of top leaders cannot be out sourced providing development vision organizing technocratic teams affecting how the system works different types of leadership political economic and ...

icon picture PPT Filetype Power Point PPT | Posted on 01 Sep 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
     Key Relations
                                     
     Leadership
      Critical role of top leaders (cannot be out-
        sourced!) 
         Providing development vision
         Organizing technocratic teams
         Affecting how the system works
      Different types of leadership: political, economic 
        and developmental, etc.
     Issues
      Sustainability of “good” (=strong & effective) 
        leaders?; succession problems
      Personal leadership vs. organizational leadership?
                                     
      Types of Leadership and 
      Technocrat Teams
                        Leadership Type            Technocrat Teams
     Japan             Organizational       MOF, EPA, MITI (super-ministry 
     (Late 50s-70s) leadership              for industrial policy)
     S. Korea          Strong personal      EPB (super-ministry), headed 
     (60s-70s)         leadership           by Deputy PM; reporting 
                                            directly to the President
     Malaysia          Strong personal      Prime Minister’s Dept. esp., 
     (80s-90s)         leadership           EPU (super-ministry) & ICU
     Thailand (80s)    Organizational       Four macro core agencies (no 
                       leadership           super-ministry); but, weak 
                                            macro-sector links
                                         
     Technocrats (Central 
     Admin.)
      Developmental coalition btw. leaders and 
        technocrats is crucial (b/c leaders alone cannot 
        design & implement policies)
      Serving as a strategic core center of development 
        management (not just donor management)
     Issues
      The stability of professional civil services often 
        threatened
          Political interference in civil service appointments; 
           technocrats are held “hostages” by political leaders.
      Weak inter-agency coordination (within central 
        admin., central-local admin., private sector, etc.)
      Problems of monitoring & evaluation
                                        
     Technocrats (Central 
     Admin.)
      Limitation in the quality and flow of information, 
        preventing the govt. from making right policy 
        decisions.
      Establishing formal systems & rules does not 
        guarantee their effective functions.
      Problems of corruption
      Capacity constraints: dilemma btw. what should 
        be done (multitude of development challenges) 
        and what can be done (govt. capacity 
        constraints); need for prioritization
      Limited bargaining power against donors; 
        sometimes, donor-driven policy and aid decision
                                     
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Key relations leadership critical role of top leaders cannot be out sourced providing development vision organizing technocratic teams affecting how the system works different types political economic and developmental etc issues sustainability good strong effective succession problems personal vs organizational technocrat type japan mof epa miti super ministry late s for industrial policy korea epb headed by deputy pm reporting directly to president malaysia prime minister dept esp epu icu thailand four macro core agencies no but weak sector links technocrats central admin coalition btw is crucial b c alone design implement policies serving as a strategic center management not just donor stability professional civil services often threatened interference in service appointments are held hostages inter agency coordination within local private monitoring evaluation limitation quality flow information preventing govt from making right decisions establishing formal systems rules does guar...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.