130x Filetype PPT File size 0.18 MB Source: www.grips.ac.jp
Key Relations Leadership Critical role of top leaders (cannot be out- sourced!) Providing development vision Organizing technocratic teams Affecting how the system works Different types of leadership: political, economic and developmental, etc. Issues Sustainability of “good” (=strong & effective) leaders?; succession problems Personal leadership vs. organizational leadership? Types of Leadership and Technocrat Teams Leadership Type Technocrat Teams Japan Organizational MOF, EPA, MITI (super-ministry (Late 50s-70s) leadership for industrial policy) S. Korea Strong personal EPB (super-ministry), headed (60s-70s) leadership by Deputy PM; reporting directly to the President Malaysia Strong personal Prime Minister’s Dept. esp., (80s-90s) leadership EPU (super-ministry) & ICU Thailand (80s) Organizational Four macro core agencies (no leadership super-ministry); but, weak macro-sector links Technocrats (Central Admin.) Developmental coalition btw. leaders and technocrats is crucial (b/c leaders alone cannot design & implement policies) Serving as a strategic core center of development management (not just donor management) Issues The stability of professional civil services often threatened Political interference in civil service appointments; technocrats are held “hostages” by political leaders. Weak inter-agency coordination (within central admin., central-local admin., private sector, etc.) Problems of monitoring & evaluation Technocrats (Central Admin.) Limitation in the quality and flow of information, preventing the govt. from making right policy decisions. Establishing formal systems & rules does not guarantee their effective functions. Problems of corruption Capacity constraints: dilemma btw. what should be done (multitude of development challenges) and what can be done (govt. capacity constraints); need for prioritization Limited bargaining power against donors; sometimes, donor-driven policy and aid decision
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.