jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Science Ppt 70733 | Ethics Module 2(1)


 120x       Filetype PPTX       File size 0.31 MB       Source: www.istc.int


File: Science Ppt 70733 | Ethics Module 2(1)
acknowledgements this virtual course on responsible research export control and ethics in the life sciences related to chemical biological radiological and nuclear sciences has been produced and prepared for the ...

icon picture PPTX Filetype Power Point PPTX | Posted on 30 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
 Acknowledgements  
                This virtual course on responsible research, export control and 
                ethics in the life sciences related to chemical, biological, radiological 
                and nuclear sciences has been produced and prepared for the 
                International Science and Technology Center (ISTC) as part of the EU 
                funded Targeted Initiative on CBRN Export Control on Dual-Use 
                Materials and Intangible Technologies. 
                The support of the European Commission for this course does not 
                constitute endorsement of the contents which reflects the views 
                only of the authors. 
                The content of the course was created by Ineke Malsch. The project 
                team of the Targeted Initiative on CBRN Export Control on Dual-Use 
                Materials and Intangible Technologies provided comments and 
                editing of the material.
 Module 2 – The role of scientists
                     Introduction – Addressing the special role of scientists
                     Governing dual use life sciences calls for collective responsibility, 
                     engaging governments, scientists, industry, and civil society.
                     Unlike existing products and activities in society, 
                     science and technology tend to challenge existing           Regulatory procedures addressing the 
                     laws regulating environmental, health and safety            new issues often struggle to keep up 
                                                                                 with the pace of innovation
                     and other ethical and societal aspects
                     To help fill this gap between innovation and 
                     regulation, voluntary measures are  
                     frequently adopted to avoid or preempt                governments impose soft regulations 
                     restrictive legislative measures                      complementary to formal law
                                                                           professional societies adopt policies and 
                                                                           codes of conduct 
                                                                           groups of scientists develop codes in 
                                                                           bottom-up initiatives
 Module 2 – The role of scientists
                    Introduction – Addressing the special role of scientists
                    In addition to the general gap between                 In addition to formal knowledge, e.g. in 
                    innovation and regulation, dual use                    publications, tacit knowledge and know-
                    technologies, materials, and knowledge                 how could be misused 
                    have misuse potential                                         (the different forms of knowledge are 
                                                                                              addressed in module 4)
                     Technological, social and regulatory 
                     measures can be used to prevent misuse
                          (as listed in the concept ‘web of prevention’ in module 1)
                    Scientific institutions have a key role in implementation of measures
                          In this module, the special roles of scientific institutions and individual scientists for 
                          both addressing the innovation-regulation gap and the misuse potential are explained
  Module 2 – The role of scientists
                        Distributed responsibilities for responsible research
                         Stakeholder community                          Role responsibilities of each community
                         Policy makers:                                 Regulate, orchestrate governance, engage in public 
                                                                        dialogue
                         Authorities (e.g. labour inspectorate,         Enforce regulations, align funding with standards
                         customs): 
                         Large industry and Small and Medium            Corporate Social Responsibility, engage in public 
                         Enterprises:                                   dialogue, lobbying
                         Researcher institutions and individual         Raise awareness of legal responsibilities under 
                         researchers:                                   national and international law, voluntary self-
                                                                        regulations and standards, engagement with policy 
                                                                        community, engage in public dialogue, and 
                                                                        implement regulations
                         NB: There are other relevant and pertinent stakeholders, this list is not meant to comprehensively survey the 
                         very complex network of actors involved in the crafting, designing, implementation, adoption, adaptation, 
                         enforcement and verification, as well as reviewing and evaluating relevant measures and instruments. 
  Module 2 – The role of scientists
                         Review of professional codes of conduct – example of life sciences
                         This review illustrates that codes of conduct for research are developed by different 
                         stakeholders for different reasons 
                         Who formulated         Aims and scope                                 Examples
                         the code?
                         Governments            Such codes are a form of “soft law” to fill    UNESCO Recommendation on 
                                                the gap between existing hard law and          Science and Scientific Researchers 
                                                unregulated frontier science and               (1974, 2017)
                                                technology.                                    Universal Declaration on Bioethics 
                                                                                               and Human Rights (UNESCO, 2005)
                         Professional           Setting standards for professional             American Society for Microbiology 
                         societies              conduct of the members of the society.         code of ethics (2000) (and others in 
                                                Codes can be aspirational (no sanctions),      Global Ethics Observatory)
                                                educational or regulatory (imposing 
                                                sanctions)
                         Bottom-up              Voluntary declarations by groups of            WEF Young scientists code of ethics 
                         initiatives            (young) scientists to take responsibility      (2017)
                                                for the impacts of research
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Acknowledgements this virtual course on responsible research export control and ethics in the life sciences related to chemical biological radiological nuclear has been produced prepared for international science technology center istc as part of eu funded targeted initiative cbrn dual use materials intangible technologies support european commission does not constitute endorsement contents which reflects views only authors content was created by ineke malsch project team provided comments editing material module role scientists introduction addressing special governing calls collective responsibility engaging governments industry civil society unlike existing products activities tend challenge regulatory procedures laws regulating environmental health safety new issues often struggle keep up with pace innovation other ethical societal aspects help fill gap between regulation voluntary measures are frequently adopted avoid or preempt impose soft regulations restrictive legislative comp...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.