jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Final Agenda 17 Padcc Revised


 161x       Filetype PDF       File size 1.51 MB       Source: democracy.lbhf.gov.uk


Final Agenda 17 Padcc Revised

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 17 Sep 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
              
                                London Borough Of Hammersmith & Fulham 
              
             --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
                                Planning Applications Committee 
                                                       
                                    Agenda for 7th November 2017 
                                                       
                     Index of Applications, Enforcement Actions, Advertisements etc. 
             --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
             WARD:                    SITE ADDRESS:                                     PAGE: 
             REG NO: 
              
              
              Hammersmith              The Triangle (5-17 Hammersmith Grove) And              17 
              Broadway                 Britannia House (1-11 Glenthorne Road), 3 And 3A 
              2017/02717/FUL           Hammersmith Grove And 12-18 Beadon Road, 
                                       Hammersmith, London W6 0LH         
              
              College Park And Old     The Gateway Site  White City Place  201 Wood           84 
              Oak                      Lane  London  W12 
              2016/04452/COMB 
              
              Shepherd's Bush Green  Former Laundry Site Rear Of Nos. 9 - 61 Pennard        165 
              2017/03851/FUL           Road   London  W12     
              
              Ravenscourt Park         12 And 14 Wellesley Avenue  London  W6 0UP           197 
              2017/02065/FUL 
              
              Avonmore And Brook       Cumberland Lodge   21 Cumberland Crescent            233 
              Green                    London  W14 8XB   
              2017/02684/FUL 
              
              
              
                                                       
            --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
            Ward:  Hammersmith Broadway 
             
            Site Address: 
            The Triangle (5-17 Hammersmith Grove) And Britannia House (1-
            11 Glenthorne Road), 3 And 3A Hammersmith Grove And 12-18 
            Beadon Road, Hammersmith, London W6 0LH         
             
                 
                                                                                      
                                                   
                © Crown Copyright. All Rights Reserved. London Borough Hammersmith and Fulham LA100019223 (2013). 
                            For identification purposes only - do not scale. 
                 
             
            Reg. No:                        Case Officer: 
            2017/02717/FUL                  Matthew Lawton 
                                             
            Date Valid:                     Conservation Area: 
            17.07.2017                       
             
            Committee Date: 07.11.2017 
                                                    
               
              Applicant: 
              Romulus Construction Limited 
              C/o Agent    
               
              Description: 
              Demolition of all existing buildings on the site and redevelopment to provide a building 
              of between 8 and 14 storeys in height plus two basement levels, comprising of 466 sqm 
              GEA retail/commercial space (Class A1, A2 or A3) at ground floor level to the south and 
              west of the building; office entrance, reception and ancillary office/gallery space to the 
              east and north of the building at ground floor level fronting Hammersmith Grove and 
              Glenthorne Road; service area to west accessed from Beadon Road including 1 
              accessible parking space; Class B1 office space from first to thirteenth floors (23,878 
              sqm GEA); plant enclosure at roof level; 15 car parking spaces, gym, plant, cycle 
              storage and ancillary retail/office space in the two basement levels. 
              Drg Nos: 699_02_07_098 Rev.P4, 099 Rev.P4, 100 Rev.P5; 699_07_101 Rev.P3, 102 
              Rev.P3, 103 Rev.P3, 104 Rev.P3, 105 Rev.P3; 699_02_07_106 Rev.P3, 107 Rev.P3, 
              108 Rev.P3, 109 Rev.P5, 120 Rev.P1; 699_07_210 Rev.P3; 699_02_07_211 Rev.P3, 
              212 Rev.P3; 699_07_213 Rev.P3, 300 Rev.P3, 301 Rev.P3; 699_02_07_501 Rev.P2, 
              503 Rev.P2. 
               
               
              Application Type: 
              Full Detailed Planning Application 
               
              --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
              --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
               
                                                      ADDENDUM 
               
              1.0   Introduction  
               
              1.1    At the Committee’s last meeting (10/10/17) the current application to provide a 
                     building containing commercial space, a gallery at ground floor level and Class 
                     B1 office space was considered.  
               
              1.2    This is the fourth planning application submitted by the developer since 
                     December 2014 with only one application determined (02/09/15). That 
                     application was refused and is subject to a planning appeal due to be considered 
                     by a public inquiry (09/05/18). 
               
              2.0  Current application 
               
              2.1    At the last meeting Committee resolved to refuse, subject to no contrary direction 
                     from the London Mayor, due to: 
               
                     1.  Height and massing of the proposed building. 
                     2.  Impact on views into and out of nearby conservation areas. 
                     3.  Loss of a locally listed Building of Merit. 
               
                                                              
              2.2    Due to the scale of the application the determination will be referred to the Mayor 
                     of London, and is subject to any direction he may make. The current application 
                     is yet to be referred to the Mayor 
               
              2.3    The Council has a duty to ensure consideration of all material matters in 
                     determining applications and can consider applications further at a subsequent 
                     meeting until a decision notice is issued.  
               
              3.0  For consideration 
               
              3.1    Officers need to ensure the committee is fully advised of all the matters prior to 
                     issuing a decision notice. As such it is appropriate for the committee to ensure 
                     consideration of all material issues presented by officers. 
               
              3.2    The committee needs to be clear of the significant risk in relation to the appeal 
                     scheme and its decision in relation to the current application. This is a material 
                     consideration that Committee is required to fully assess in determining the 
                     current application.  
               
              3.3    The Council’s stated position on the appeal application is: it is not opposed to the 
                     principle of the redevelopment of the site. Permission was refused on the appeal 
                     scheme due to the specific detail of the proposals.  
               
              3.4    As set out in the report, the current application addresses the specific reasons for 
                     refusal of the appeal scheme. This is the reason why officers recommend 
                     approval of the current application.   
               
              3.5    The three areas of concern identified by committee are addressed in detail in the 
                     current application report. Committee’s attention is drawn to paragraphs: 
               
                     ▪   3.10–3.50 set out the design of the building (including massing), its 
                         relationship to conservation areas, setting back of the building line and how 
                         this addresses the reasons for refusal of the appeal scheme.   
                     ▪   3.38–3.44 address the public benefits of new areas of open space weighed 
                         against the loss of the Building of Merit, again addressing the reason for 
                         refusal of the appeal scheme. 
               
              3.6    Committee needs to ensure consistency of approach in determining the 
                     application, given that the principle of the redevelopment of the site is accepted, 
                     and having considered the view of officers that the current application addresses 
                     the specific reasons for refusal of the appeal scheme. 
               
              3.7    Sufficient weight also needs to be given to other elements of the current scheme, 
                     that are different, or of greater benefit than the appeal scheme. In particular, 
                     paragraphs 4.1–4.7 of the report give a summary of officers’ conclusions on the 
                     current application. 
               
              3.8    Should the developer lodge an appeal against a refusal of the current scheme 
                     the Council would be required to defend the reasons and provide robust 
                     evidence. At such an appeal, the absence of robust evidence to support a reason 
                     for refusal would be viewed as unreasonable. This would pose a significant risk 
                                                              
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...London borough of hammersmith fulham planning applications committee agenda for th november index enforcement actions advertisements etc ward site address page reg no the triangle grove and broadway britannia house glenthorne road a ful beadon w lh college park old gateway white city place wood oak lane comb shepherd s bush green former laundry rear nos pennard ravenscourt wellesley avenue up avonmore brook cumberland lodge crescent xb crown copyright all rights reserved la identification purposes only do not scale case officer matthew lawton date valid conservation area applicant romulus construction limited c o agent description demolition existing buildings on redevelopment to provide building between storeys in height plus two basement levels comprising sqm gea retail commercial space class or at ground floor level south west office entrance reception ancillary gallery east north fronting service accessed from including accessible parking b first thirteenth floors plant enclosure r...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.