143x Filetype PPT File size 2.01 MB Source: hr.wharton.upenn.edu
Wharton Committee Dan Alig Shanna Hocking Colleen O’Neill Jonathan Katzenbach Peter Winicov Kim Ridley Amy Collins Tammy Rawls Emma Grigore Jill Gran Anna Loh 2 Wharton Human Resources Participants in the pilot program Wharton ULAR Business Services Exec Dir BSD Finance SAS Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC) SAS Facilities SAS computing SAS Human Resources ELP LPS Department of Africana Studies Center for Africana Studies Chemistry SAS Finance and Administration Professional and Liberal Education 3 Wharton Human Resources Objectives Introduce an easier way to facilitate feedback Encourage more frequent and timely conversations Create a collaborative process Focus on the feedback and not the process 4 Wharton Human Resources Wharton Human Resources Differences Annual Review Feedback Sessions Outdated Updated Occurs at the end of the fiscal Occurs at the end of the quarter year Focus on the past and tasks Focus on the future Supervisor driven Equal partners Focuses on process Focuses on feedback Establishes development opportunities Develops development opportunities once a year four times a year Time consuming Easier Supervisor “rates” the employee No ratings 5 Wharton Human Resources Process End of each quarter employee and supervisor will receive an email directing them to answer questions in an automated system.* Employee or supervisor will schedule a feedback meeting. Discuss answers. In Q4, supervisor will set goals for upcoming fiscal year. HR will be able to see who is participating. *until the process is automated, we will use a paper form sent via email. 6 Wharton Human Resources
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.