166x Filetype PPT File size 0.21 MB Source: www.seas.upenn.edu
Background: • Initial suture testing proved inconclusive due to small sample size and inaccurate testing procedures • Larger sample size and the use of Instron technology will allow for investigation and comparison of the material properties of two suture techniques Hypothesis & Objectives: Based on raw data collected in past experiments, it is hypothesized that the horizontal mattress suture technique will have a greater failure strength and higher Young’s Modulus than the vertical mattress suture technique. Department of Bioengineering Julianne Huegel Methods & Protocol: • Sample size is ten successful sample failures for each suture technique. • Measure and cut 20 samples of the CottonDuck canvas material with dimensions of 7.5 cm by 2.4 cm. Cut each of these in half crosswise. • Create two groups of 10 “wound” samples and sew 4 stitches into each sample, with one population receiving horizontal mattress stitches and one population receiving vertical mattress stitches. Each stitch should be of uniform length, spacing, and distance from the edges of the sample to be determined as appropriate by the group. • Insert each sample into the clamps, run Instron. Collect Stress-Strain curve data. Use a speed previously determined to be appropriate by using other materials. A speed of 60 mm/min is recommended. Use tape to minimize slippage if necessary. • Save data for further analysis. Department of Bioengineering Leia Harbour Proposed Findings: The two populations, vertical and horizontal mattress suture samples, will provide ten trials each. Each trial will produce a: A sample Stress-Strain curve: 1. Stress vs. Strain Curve 2. Young’s Modulus 3. Failure Strength 4. Descriptive statistics and t-tests will be used to analyze Items 2 and 3 to investigate possible statistically significant differences between the techniques. In accordance with the hypothesis, it is expected that vertical mattress sutures will have a lower Young’s modulus and a lower failure strength based on our pilot data. http://nsmwww.eng.ohio-state.edu/Stamping_Glossary/assets/images/autogen/a_y3.gif Department of Bioengineering Chia-Heng Wu Potential Pitfalls: • Inability of clamps to secure the sutured material in a fixed position resulting in slippage. • Experimenter’s inability to have a constant suturing technique which could result in unequally spaced stitches. • Some sutures may be tighter than others within a test sample. • May experience failure in the material prior to failure of the sutures. Department of Bioengineering William Okech Equipment, Materials and Budget Materials to be Purchased: • The Instron will be utilized to Individual Price test for the desired material properties. Straight Roundpoint $15.56 • Needle (4 in. x 12) Needles and polyester thread are necessary for suturing two Polyester Thread (diam. $5.16 pieces of canvas together. 0.023 in x 206 yds w/ 21 • lb. tensile strength) Polyethylene tape will be provided for preventing slippage. CottonDuck Canvas $2.08/ft *15 ft = Fabric (0.04 in. thick x $31.2 • Heavyweight canvas is used in 36 in. wide) order to limit material Polyethylene Tape (1/32 $20.13 deformation to the suture only. in. thick x 72 yds) • To ensure suture failure, TOTAL PRICE (all mat’ls $72.05 polyester thread was chosen supplied by McMaster- because it’s tensile strength is Carr) less than that of other suture materials. Department of Bioengineering Group 102B3
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.