256x Filetype PDF File size 0.09 MB Source: hmmcollege.ac.in
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT POLICY, 2006 Introduction National Environment Policy, 2006 is a response to India’s national commitment to a clean environment mandated in the Constitution in Articles 48 A and 51 A (g), strengthened by judicial interpretation of Article 21. It is recognized that the maintenance of the healthy environment is not the responsibility of the state alone. It is the responsibility of every citizen and thus a spirit of partnership is to be realized through the environment management of the country. Key Environment Challenges The key environmental challenges that India faces are related to the nexus of environmental degradation with poverty in its main dimensions and economic growth. Challenges are intrinsically connected with the state of environmental resources such as land, water, air and their flora and fauna. Drivers of Degradation Proximate drivers of environmental degradation are population growth, inappropriate technology, consumption choices and poverty leading to changes in relations between people and ecosystem and developmental activities such as intensive agriculture, polluting industry and unplanned urbanization. Other drivers of degradation are the lack of clarity or enforcement of rights of access and use of environmental resources, policies which provide disincentives for environmental conservation (and which may have origins in the fiscal regime), market failures (which may be linked to shortcomings in the regulatory regimes), and governance constraints. Impact on Health Poor environmental quality has adversely affected human health. Environmental factors are estimated as being responsible in some cases for nearly 20 percent of the burden of disease in India, and a number of environment-health factors are closely linked with dimensions of poverty (e.g. malnutrition, lack of access to clean energy and water). Interventions such as reducing indoor air pollution, protecting sources of safe drinking water, protecting soil from contamination, improved sanitation measures, and better public health governance, offer tremendous opportunities in reducing the incidence of a number of critical health problems. Features of National Environment Policy, 2006 • The dominant theme of this policy is that while conservation of environmental resources is necessary to secure livelihoods and well-being of all, the most secure basis for conservation is to ensure that people dependent on particular resources obtain better livelihoods from the fact of conservation, than from degradation of the resource • The policy also seeks to stimulate partnerships of different stakeholders, i.e. public agencies, local communities, academic and scientific institutions, the investment community, and international development partners, in harnessing their respective resources and strengths for environmental management • Involvement of Panchayati Raj Institutions and urban local bodies has been highlighted. • It also seeks to revisit the Coastal Regulation Zone notifications to make the approach to coastal environmental regulation more holistic and, thereby, ensure protection to coastal ecological systems, waters and the vulnerability of some coastal areas to extreme natural events and potential sea level rise. • Environmental Impact Assessment will continue to be the principal methodology for appraisal and review of new projects. • To achieve sustainable development, environmental protection shall constitute an integral part of the development process and cannot be considered in isolation from it. Objectives of National Environment Policy, 2006 Following are the National Environment Policy, 2006: 1. Conservation of Critical Environmental Resources: To protect and conserve critical environmental resources and invaluable natural and man- made heritage which are essential for life-supporting livelihoods and welfare of the society. 2. Inter-generational Equity: To ensure judicious use of environmental resources to meet the needs and aspirations of present and future generations 3. Efficiency in Environmental Resources Use: To ensure efficient use of environmental resources in the sense of reduction in their use per unit of economic output and to minimize adverse environmental impacts on society 4. Environmental Governance in the Management of Resources: To apply the principles of resources and to apply the principles of good governance (i.e. transparency, rationality, accountability, reduction in costs and time, and public participation) to the management of environmental resources 5. Enhancement of Resources: Appropriate technology and traditional knowledge, managerial skills, and social capital will be used for conservation and enhancement of resources. 6. Livelihood Security for the Poor: To ensure equitable access to environmental resources for poor tribal community, which are most dependent on environmental resources for their livelihood 7. Integration of Environmental Concerns for Socio-economic Development; to integrate environmental concerns into policies, plans, programmes and projects for socio-economic development. Principles of National Environment Policy 2006 The Policy evolved from the recognition that only such development is sustainable, which respects ecological constraints, and the imperatives of justice. The Objectives stated above are to be realized through various strategic interventions by different public authorities at Central, State, and Local Government levels. They would also be the basis of diverse partnerships. The principles followed in the policy are: 1. Human Beings are at the Centre of Sustainable Development Concerns: 2. Right to development must be fulfilled so as to equitably meet developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations. 3. In order to achieve sustainable development, environmental protection shall constitute an integral part of the development process and cannot be considered in isolation from it. 4. Where there are credible threats of serious or irreversible damage to key environmental resources, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. 5. In various public actions for environmental conservation, economic efficiency would be sought to be realized
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.