jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Excel Sample Sheet 33701 | Eq Sample4


 232x       Filetype XLSX       File size 0.04 MB       Source: www.revenue.wi.gov


File: Excel Sample Sheet 33701 | Eq Sample4
sheet 1 instr i providing stratified analysis of annual economic activity instructions and initial entry this is a simplified form for local assessors to provide greater detail when they feel ...

icon picture XLSX Filetype Excel XLSX | Posted on 10 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial file snippet.
Sheet 1: Instr

I. Providing Stratified Analysis of Annual Economic Activity

Instructions and Initial Entry



This is a simplified form for local assessors to provide greater detail when they feel that the sales activity (or lack thereof)

may not provide a valid indicator of the economic activity within any one class of property, or has credible information of activity

of specific strata within a class. You are encouraged to review the handout titled "Guidelines for Assessors Stratifying Local Base",

or Chapter 14 of the WPAM.

The attached 6 worksheets are meant to deal with stratifying one class. The areas highlighited in yellow are data entry areas.

To be considered, this material should be provided no later than mid-May to the district Equalization office.
















Date: 6/4/2004
Community Name: V Badger
Projecting for Assessment Year: 2004



Class being Stratified: Commercial
Prior Year Class SOA Value: $3,270,900,500 Note: This comes from the Statement of Assessment
Prior Year Class State Value: $3,603,551,300 Note: This does not include 70.57 corrections
Calendar year of SOA Value: 2003



Sales: Total number in Class: 9 Note: The sales reported should tie in with the number and values
Sales: Total Assessed Values: $6,396,400 of sales activity in the current year's Assm't to Sales analysis
Sales: Total Sales Price: $7,764,600 provided by DOR. If not, please explain differences.
Calendar year of Sales Used: 2003



It is always helpful for the assessor to email the district office the file of sales which they are using in their analysis, including any statistical

calculations they consider relevant. The assessment to sales analysis DOR has is on the mainframe, and does not provide easy access

for further calculations a PC based worksheet would provide.


Sheet 2: Base


II. Stratification of Total Assessed Value of Class From Roll






Date: 6/4/2004 SOA Year of Assessed Value: 2003
Community: V Badger


Property Class: Commercial Reported Totals: $3,270,900,500


Calculated (below) Totals: $3,270,801,515 100.00%
Stratum Stratum Stratum Value on Roll Strata as
Name Code Description
% of Class
Apartments 1
$228,963,035 7.00%
Banks 2
$65,418,010 2.00%
Food Stores 3
$32,709,005 1.00%
General Retail 4
$490,635,090 15.00%
Hotels 5
$196,254,030 6.00%
Miscellaneous 6
$65,418,010 2.00%
Office 7
$1,471,905,225 45.00%
Restaurants 8
$65,418,010 2.00%
Shopping Centers 9
$457,926,070 14.00%
Service Stations 10
$32,705,005 1.00%
Wharehouse 11
$163,450,025 5.00%




0.00%




0.00%




0.00%




0.00%




0.00%





STRATUM NAME: Whatever convienient short reference the assessor uses for the specific grouping of similar properties








STRATUM CODE: Not necessary, however this is a handy reference if the assessor maintains a code on the roll.








STRATUM DESCRIPTION: Not necessary, however allows for further explaination if the 'name' isn't fully descriptive.








REPORTED v. CALCULATED TOTALS: Compare the numbers on page 1 to the sum of the detail on this page. They should match.








NOTE: In instances where there is a large % of the class value associated with one entity, it would be helpful to treat that entity as



a separate stratum. Examples might be smaller communities with landfill sites, golf courses, regional shopping malls,



or large valued headquarter office complexes.




Sheet 3: Sales


III. Sales Ratio Analysis by Stratum












Date: 6/4/2004





Community: V Badger






Reported Totals: 9
$6,396,400 $7,764,600


Calculated (below) Totals: 9
$6,396,400 $7,764,600 82.38%
Stratum Stratum # of # Adequate? Assessed Sale Aggregate Useable
Name Code Sales No=1 Value Price Ratio Agg Ratio
Apartments 1 1 1 $270,900 $410,000 66.07% 0.00%
Banks 2 1 1 $519,700 $530,000 98.06% 0.00%
Food Stores 3
1

0.00% 0.00%
General Retail 4 2 1 $1,687,700 $1,715,000 98.41% 0.00%
Hotels 5 1 1 $708,000 $1,200,000 59.00% 0.00%
Miscellaneous 6
1

0.00% 0.00%
Office 7 1 1 $190,000 $212,600 89.37% 0.00%
Restaurants 8
1

0.00% 0.00%
Shopping Centers 9
1

0.00% 0.00%
Service Stations 10 1 1 $940,000 $1,097,000 85.69% 0.00%
Wharehouse 11 2 1 $2,080,100 $2,600,000 80.00% 0.00%
0 0



0.00% 0.00%
0 0



0.00% 0.00%
0 0



0.00% 0.00%
0 0



0.00% 0.00%
0 0



0.00% 0.00%








This page allows for the assessor to summarize assessed value totals, sales value totals and number of sales by each of their stratum.














# ADEQUATE?, NO=1, In this column the assessor should report their judgement of whether the number of sales is adequate






to reflect the assessment level of that specific stratum.








NOTE: For the formulas to work, if there are any sales in the stratum, and the number is not adequate,






the entry in this column MUST BE THE NUMBER '1'.












REPORTED v. CALCULATED TOTALS: Compare the numbers on page 1 to the sum of the detail on this page. They should match.














AGGREGATE RATIO: The aggregate ratio is the relationship between all the reported assessments and sales.














USEABLE RATIO: The ratios only reflect those strata in which the assessor felt there was an adequate quantity of sales.







The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Sheet instr i providing stratified analysis of annual economic activity instructions and initial entry this is a simplified form for local assessors to provide greater detail when they feel that the sales or lack thereof may not valid indicator within any one class property has credible information specific strata you are encouraged review handout titled quot guidelines stratifying base chapter wpam attached worksheets meant deal with areas highlighited in yellow data be considered material should provided no later than midmay district equalization office date community name v badger projecting assessment year being commercial prior soa value note comes from statement state does include corrections calendar total number reported tie values assessed current s assm t price by dor if please explain differences used it always helpful assessor email file which using their including statistical calculations consider relevant on mainframe easy access further pc based worksheet would ii strati...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.