Authentication
136x Tipe DOC Ukuran file 2.91 MB Source: www.foodstandards.gov.au
2-05 23 March 2005 FINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT PROPOSAL P265 PRIMARY PRODUCTION & PROCESSING STANDARD FOR SEAFOOD FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND (FSANZ) FSANZ’s role is to protect the health and safety of people in Australia and New Zealand through the maintenance of a safe food supply. FSANZ is a partnership between ten Governments: the Commonwealth; Australian States and Territories; and New Zealand. It is a statutory authority under Commonwealth law and is an independent, expert body. FSANZ is responsible for developing, varying and reviewing standards and for developing codes of conduct with industry for food available in Australia and New Zealand covering labelling, composition and contaminants. In Australia, FSANZ also develops food standards for food safety, maximum residue limits, primary production and processing and a range of other functions including the coordination of national food surveillance and recall systems, conducting research and assessing policies about imported food. The FSANZ Board approves new standards or variations to food standards in accordance with policy guidelines set by the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council (Ministerial Council) made up of Commonwealth, State and Territory and New Zealand Health Ministers as lead Ministers, with representation from other portfolios. Approved standards are then notified to the Ministerial Council. The Ministerial Council may then request that FSANZ review a proposed or existing standard. If the Ministerial Council does not request that FSANZ review the draft standard, or amends a draft standard, the standard is adopted by reference under the food laws of the Commonwealth, States, Territories and New Zealand. The Ministerial Council can, independently of a notification from FSANZ, request that FSANZ review a standard. The process for amending the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code) is prescribed in the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act). The diagram below represents the different stages in the process including when periods of public consultation occur. This process varies for matters that are urgent or minor in significance or complexity. Comment on scope, possible INITIAL An IA report is prepared with an outline of issues and options and direction of ASSESSMENT possible options; affected parties are identified and questions regulatory framework for stakeholders are included Provide information and answer Applications accepted by FSANZ Board questions raised in Initial IA Report released for public comment Assessment report Public Identify other groups or Consultation individuals who might be affected Public submissions collated and analysed and how – whether financially or A Draft Assessment (DA) report is prepared using information in some other way provided by the applicant, stakeholders and other sources A scientific risk assessment is prepared as well as other DRAFT scientific studies completed using the best scientific evidence ASSESSMENT available Risk analysis is completed and a risk management plan is developed together with a communication plan Comment on scientific risk Impact analysis is used to identify costs and benefits to all assessment; proposed affected groups regulatory decision and Public An appropriate regulatory response is identified and if justification and wording of draft Consultation necessary a draft food standard is prepared standard A WTO notification is prepared if necessary Comment on costs and benefits DA Report considered by FSANZ Board and assessment of regulatory DA Report released for public comment impacts Comments received on DA report are analysed and FINAL amendments made to the report and the draft regulations as ASSESSMENT required The FSANZ Board approves or rejects the Final Assessment report Public The Ministerial Council is notified within 14 days of the Those who have provided Information decision submissions are notified of the If the Ministerial Council does not ask FSANZ to review a Board’s decision MINISTERIAL draft standard, it is gazetted and automatically becomes law COUNCIL in Australia and New Zealand The Ministerial Council can ask FSANZ to review the draft standard up to two times After a second review, the Ministerial Council can revoke the draft standard. If it amends or decides not to amend the draft standard, gazettal of the standard proceeds 2 Final Assessment Stage FSANZ has now completed two stages of the assessment process and held two rounds of public consultation as part of its assessment of this Proposal. This Final Assessment Report and its recommendations have been approved by the FSANZ Board and notified to the Ministerial Council. If the Ministerial Council does not request FSANZ to review the draft amendments to the Code, an amendment to the Code is published in the Commonwealth Gazette and the New Zealand Gazette and adopted by reference and without amendment under Australian State and Territory food law. Note, however, that this particular Standard, will not apply in New Zealand. Further Information Further Information on this Proposal and the assessment process should be addressed to the FSANZ Standards Management Officer at one of the following addresses. Food Standards Australia New Zealand Food Standards Australia New Zealand PO Box 7186 PO Box 10559 Canberra BC ACT 2610 The Terrace WELLINGTON 6036 AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND Tel (02) 6271 2222 Tel (04) 473 9942 www.foodstandards.gov.au www.foodstandards.govt.nz Assessment reports are available for viewing and downloading from the FSANZ website www.foodstandards.gov.au or alternatively paper copies of the reports can be requested from FSANZ’s Information Officer at info@foodstandards.gov.au including other general enquiries and requests for information. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................7 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................7 1.1 FOOD SAFETY IS A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE.............................................................................7 1.2 AUSTRALIAN FOOD STANDARDS............................................................................................7 2. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................7 2.1 THE SEAFOOD SECTOR..........................................................................................................7 2.2 DEVELOPMENT OF A PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND PROCESSING STANDARD FOR SEAFOOD.....7 2.3 LABELLING OF FISH NAMES...................................................................................................7 3. CURRENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS SEAFOOD SAFETY............7 3.1 DOMESTIC PRODUCTION - REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR FOOD SAFETY........................7 3.1.1 Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code - adopted nationally under State/Territory legislation.............................................................................................................7 3.1.2 State and Territory regulations for the primary production of seafood........................7 3.1.3 Australian Shellfish Quality Assurance Program (ASQAP).........................................7 3.2 VOLUNTARY INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR DOMESTIC PRODUCTION.............7 3.3 IMPORTED SEAFOOD - REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR FOOD SAFETY...............................7 3.3.1 Recognised quality assurance arrangements...............................................................7 3.3.2 Certification provided by overseas governments.........................................................7 3.3.3 Monitoring for food safety by States and Territories...................................................7 3.3.4 Enforcement of process standards for imported food...................................................7 3.3.5 Importation of seafood from New Zealand..................................................................7 3.4 FOOD SAFETY AND EXPORTED SEAFOOD...............................................................................7 3.5 SUMMARY OF REGULATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN SEAFOOD SECTOR.....................................7 4. REGULATORY PROBLEM......................................................................................................7 4.1 GROWING GLOBAL BURDEN OF FOOD-BORNE ILLNESS..........................................................7 4.2 IMPACTS OF FOOD-BORNE ILLNESS IN AUSTRALIA................................................................7 4.3 A NEW APPROACH TO FOOD SAFETY.....................................................................................7 4.4 IDENTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS POSED BY SEAFOOD........................7 4.4.1 Risk ranking method....................................................................................................7 4.4.2 Future reviews of the risk ranking...............................................................................7 4.4.3 Food safety hazards in seafood...................................................................................7 4.4.4 Summary of risk rankings............................................................................................7 4.5 EXAMINATION OF EXISTING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND THEIR CONTROL OF IDENTIFIED RISKS 7 4.5.1 Seafood ranked as high (relative to other seafood).....................................................7 4.5.2 Lower risk seafood......................................................................................................7 5. OBJECTIVE...............................................................................................................................7 6. REGULATORY OPTIONS........................................................................................................7 6.1 SCOPE OF THE STANDARD AND DEFINITION OF SEAFOOD.....................................................7 6.2 OPTION 1 – THE STATUS QUO................................................................................................7 6.3 OPTION 2 – A PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND PROCESSING STANDARD TARGETING HIGH-RISK SEAFOOD ACTIVITIES ONLY................................................................................................................7 6.4 OPTION 3 – A RISK-BASED PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND PROCESSING STANDARD TO IMPROVE THE OVERALL SAFETY IN THE SEAFOOD SUPPLY CHAIN......................................................7 6.5 SUMMARY OF OPTIONS..........................................................................................................7 7. IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR SEAFOOD.....................................................................................7 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.