162x Filetype PDF File size 0.17 MB Source: career.fsu.edu
Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire Diverse Populations Literature Review Author, Title Sample Variables Measures Major Findings Year Albion, M. Factors influencing Study 1: 121 Career decision status CDDQ In adolescents & adults, multidimensional model of J., & career decision making Australian Personality type IPIP Five-Factor CDDQ fit both groups Fogarty, G. in adolescents and adolescents, 78 General intellectual Domain Scale 5 first-order factors fit better than 3 J. (2002) adults females, 43 males, functioning Shipley Institute of In adolescents, the categories of difficulties in the mean age, 15.92 years, Interests Living Scale CDDQ were significant determinants of decision status Study 2: 127 IDEAS Interest In adults, the Internal Conflicts & Lack of Knowledge Australian adults: 86 Inventory about Additional Sources subscales had relatively low females, 41 males, Personal Attributes internal consistency mean age 33.44 years Questionnaire Amir, T., & Facets of career 299 students (42% Measured career decision- CDDQ Career decision-making difficulties showed: high Gati, I. decision-making female), at Israeli making difficulties Expressed positive correlation with expressed career decision- (2006) difficulties university; mean age: Expressed career decision- Difficulties making difficulties, negative correlation with career 22.3 years making difficulties Questionnaire decision-making self-efficacy & decidedness Career decision-making Career Decision- Career decision-making style positively correlated with self-efficacy Making Self- career decision-making self-efficacy & related to level Vocational decision- Efficacy Scale of career decision-making difficulties making style Vocational Career decision-making difficulties were lower for Degree of decidedness Decision Style introvert & thinking styles Cognitive and scholastic Indicator No relationship between cognitive/scholastic ability & ability Psychometric career decision-making difficulties Entrance Test Creed, P. Reliability and validity 514 Chinese high Psychometric properties CDDQ 2 stable factors for CDDQ: Lack of Information and A., & Yin, of a Chinese version of school students of CDDQ in terms of Career Decision- Inconsistent Information W. O. the Career Decision- factor structure, reliability, Making Self- Did not confirm readiness to make a career decision (2006) Making Difficulties & validity Efficacy Scale Questionnaire Occupational Barriers Scale Di Fabio, Career decision 424 Italian apprentices, Relation between career CDDQ Negative correlations among 3 CDDQ dimensions & A., & difficulties and mean age 21.13 decision difficulties & Bar-On Emotional total EI score Palazzeschi emotional intelligence: emotional intelligence Quotient Inventory: Intrapersonal dimension of EI best predictor of CDDQ , L. (2008) Some empirical Short dimensions evidence in an Italian sample of wage- earning apprentices Author, Title Sample Variables Measures Major Findings Year Gati, I., & Internet-based versus Hebrew version paper Version (Translation) of Internet version, Hebrew sample had similar internal consistency & Saka, N. paper-and-pencil & pencil: 417 CDDQ CDDQ, English reliability between the Internet and paper & pencil (2001) assessment: Measuring recently discharged Medium of CDDQ Internet version, versions (r=.87, r=.88); similar structure derivation career decision-making soldiers; Internet: 859 administration CDDQ, Hebrew from 10 categories difficulties participants Paper & pencil English sample had high correspondence between two English version paper version, CDDQ media & pencil: 403 college English students; Internet Paper & pencil sample: 182 version, CDDQ participants Hebrew Li, X. A report on revised 1182 Chinese college Reliability of the Chinese CDDQ, Chinese Cronbach alpha ranged from .48-.87 (2007) Career Decision- students version of the CDDQ version Good construct validity, discriminant validity, & Making Difficulty Validity of the Chinese criterion-related validity Questionnaire version of the CDDQ Seems to have psychometric reliability, but more confirmation is needed Pečjak, S., Personality, 641 Slovenian 4th grade Personality CDDQ, Slovene Significant differences between career decided and & Košir, K. motivational factors students (38.7% boys, Motivational factors version undecided students on personality and motivational (2007) and difficulties in 61.3% girls) Career decision-making Big-Five Inventory, variables career decision-making difficulties Short, Personality and motivational factors explained 28% of in secondary school Career decidedness Self-regulation the variance in career decision-making students Inventory, Short Satisfaction with life scale
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.