174x Filetype PDF File size 1.27 MB Source: www2.deloitte.com
The ‘DNA’ of leadership potential Human Capital Consulting | Deloitte Leadership UK © 2020 Deloitte MCS Limited. All rights reserved. The ‘DNA’ of leadership potential Deloitte Leadership Capability Model: Theory The aim of this document is to provide an It was David McClelland (1975) who first publicised Deloitte Leadership has account of the development of the Deloitte the term ‘competency’, and the concept was developed a leadership Leadership model, based on psychological popularised further by Richard Boyatzis (1982) in model which identifies the theory and studies, leadership literature, and his seminal book ‘The Competent Manager: A empirical research. Model for Effective Performance’. There are many reasons for the popularity of competency models. ‘building blocks’ or ‘DNA’ of potential for senior Background managers. The ‘Leadership At the heart of any leadership talent They provide a common language about what is management system is a model of capability. expected of people, a foundation for Since the 1970s, behavioural competencies performance management discussions, Capability Model’ forms the have been used by organisations to capture the transparency about what matters for promotion basis of Deloitte’s criteria associated with successful leadership. It and a ‘syllabus’ for management development. processes for assessing the is estimated that 80% of organisations apply the However, despite their success in other areas capability and potential of approach (CIPD, 2007). difficulties arise when competencies are used as individual leaders. the basis for forming judgements about leaders’ potential. © 2020 Deloitte MCS Limited. All rights reserved. 2 The ‘DNA’ of leadership potential Assessing potential In the assessment of leaders’ potential, Another criticism levied towards For example, below are real examples of competencies can be criticised because they competencies is that of complexity. If you competency descriptions. The different focus heavily upon past behaviour rather than analyse most competency descriptions, you colours represent discrete future potential. The mantra behind will find that each competency is in fact an psychological skills. competency-based assessment is ‘the best amalgamation of a variety of different areas of predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour’ knowledge, skills and motivation. (Smith, 1989). Consequently, competency-based “Is clear and consistent in decision making, interviews are inherently retrospective; “tell me “ ..it often emerges that competencies do not takes actions andinspires trust in others” about a time you…”. Therefore whether a leader make psychological sense. Either the has sufficient ‘relevant’ experience will be a psychological qualities required for different “Takes responsibility within the group, keeps the group working together by significant factor in determining their behaviours described under a single adjusting own interventions, supports and competence rating. Furthermore, if an individual competency conflict with each other, or the challenges others” has not demonstrated a competency in the same thing is true across two (or more) past, what can we conclude about their different competencies - implying that it is “Uses a combination of logical argument, personal conviction and passion to create a potential to develop and display that unlikely that an individual could score highly winning case” competency in the future? on both”. Clive Fletcher (1996) © 2020 Deloitte MCS Limited. All rights reserved. 3 The ‘DNA’ of leadership potential Assessing potential As Fletcher (1996) states: “the same Consequently, the strength of competencies in psychological factors contribute to different guiding performance management by competencies. A common example would be describing clearly observable behaviours is also ‘emotional control’. This contributes to the their weakness in assessment; they are typically assessment of competencies such as ‘customer a mix of psychological factors which do not relations’, ‘resilience’ and ‘interpersonal co-vary and differ in their ability to be sensitivity’”. developed. The reason for this is that competencies are descriptions of behaviour, not psychological skills. They are the manifestation of the interaction of a variety of psychological processes, such as thinking, memory and emotions. Indeed, Boyatzis’ definition of a competency is: “a motive, trait, skills, aspect of one’s self-image or social role, or a body of knowledge which he or she uses.” Boyatzis (1982) © 2020 Deloitte MCS Limited. All rights reserved. 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.