jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Pharmacy Sig Codes Pdf 154936 | Apjan14 Medsafety


 223x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.06 MB       Source: www.ncpa.co


File: Pharmacy Sig Codes Pdf 154936 | Apjan14 Medsafety
medication safety evaluate sig codes and mnemonics for error potential many pharmacies use sig codes and mnemonics to ease and the nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drug diclofenac 75 mg accelerate the ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 17 Jan 2023 | 2 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
                                                                      Medication SAFETY
                 Evaluate Sig Codes and 
                 Mnemonics for Error Potential
                 Many pharmacies use sig codes and mnemonics to ease and          the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac 75 mg 
                 accelerate the data entry process. Sig codes (abbreviations)     with instructions to “take 1 tablet twice daily with food for 
                 are programmed into the pharmacy computer system and             shoulder and elbow pain” was actually labeled “take 1 tablet 
                 used to represent a specific set of directions. For example, a   daily with food for shoulder and elbow pain.” the error was 
                 computer system could be programmed so that the sig code         discovered when dispensing the first refill. Luckily it was 
                 “1tBid” will produce “take 1 tablet by mouth twice daily” on     determined that the patient had been taking the prescrip-
                 the pharmacy label. Mnemonics (memory aids) are pro-             tion correctly despite the incorrect label. the reporter noted 
                 grammed to represent a specific drug and dosage strength         that distractions during the original verification phase 
                 combination. For example, “LiP20” could be used to repre-        contributed to the error. More significantly, the pharmacy 
                 sent Lipitor 20 mg. While these codes can save time, they are    identified that the sig code which was used did not produce 
                 not without risk. Below are cases that illustrate how process-   the expected translation. instead of producing “take 1 tablet 
                 es involving sig codes can contribute to medication errors.      twice daily with food,” the sig code placed “take 1 tablet 
                                                                                  daily with food” on the label. When the sig code had been 
                 the institute for Safe Medication Practices received an 
                 error report in which the original prescription written for      Continued on page 15 
        Continued from page 14
       originally programmed into the pharmacy computer system, 
       the wrong directions were associated with it. 
       in a similar report from a different pharmacy, the directions 
       for the oral contraceptive tRi-SPRintec (ethinyl estradiol and 
       norgestimate) were entered incorrectly. the directions should 
       have been “take 1 tablet daily for dysmenorrhea,” but instead 
       the prescription was labeled “take 1 tablet daily for dyspepsia.” 
       Upon investigation, the pharmacy discovered that the sig code 
       “dys” had been created as a short cut for dyspepsia. However, 
       the technician believed it to represent dysmenorrhea. the 
       technician entered “dys” during data entry and the translation 
       to dyspepsia was not caught by the verification pharmacist 
       nor was it caught during two subsequent refills.
       to reduce the risk of medication errors resulting from 
       vulnerable sig codes and mnemonics, consider the 
       following strategies:
       •  Sig codes and mnemonics should only be added by 
        administrative personnel using a standardized process. 
        once built, test the sig codes and mnemonics to verify 
        they are functioning correctly.
       •  Prohibit staff from coining abbreviations for drug names 
        or entering new sig codes or mnemonics into the phar-
        macy computer system. For chain pharmacies, addition 
        of sig codes and mnemonics should not be allowed at 
        the store level.
       •  Routinely run reports of system sig codes and mnemon-
        ics in use. Remove dangerous or outdated codes and 
        mnemonics from the computer system.
       •  Avoid using dangerous mnemonics. For example, 
        “novo7030”’ should not be a mnemonic because it could 
        represent novoLin 70/30 or novoLoG Mix 70/30. Use 
        the iSMP List of confused drug names (www.ismp.org/
        tools/confuseddrugnames.pdf) for examples of drug 
        product names that can lead to error and determine if 
        codes for those drugs can be interchanged leading to the 
        data entry of unintended products.
       •  During the dispensing process, drug names listed 
        on prescriptions should be matched to computer labels 
        and manufacturers’ products. also, match the instruc-
        tions on prescriptions with those printed on the label 
        to verify accuracy.
       •  At prescription drop-off and during patient education at 
        the point of sale, verify the directions and purpose of the 
        medication with the patient.  ■
       This article is from the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. 
       Errors, near misses, or hazardous conditions may be reported 
       on the ISMP (www.ismp.org) website. ISMP can be reached at 
       215-947-7797 or ismpinfo@ismp.org.
       www.americaspharmacist.net 
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Medication safety evaluate sig codes and mnemonics for error potential many pharmacies use to ease the nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drug diclofenac mg accelerate data entry process abbreviations with instructions take tablet twice daily food are programmed into pharmacy computer system shoulder elbow pain was actually labeled used represent a specific set of directions example could be so that code discovered when dispensing first refill luckily it tbid will produce by mouth on determined patient had been taking prescrip label memory aids pro tion correctly despite incorrect reporter noted grammed dosage strength distractions during original verification phase combination lip repre contributed more significantly sent lipitor while these can save time they identified which did not without risk below cases illustrate how expected translation instead producing es involving contribute errors placed institute safe practices received an report in prescription written continued page from or...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.