121x Filetype PDF File size 0.31 MB Source: www.cmcwtrl.in
13urus Vul. 23, No. 6, pp. 517-514, 1997 D 1997 Ekevier Sciellce Ltd for 1331. AI rights reserved Printed in Great Britain 0305-ami 517.00 T 0.00 ELSEVIER PI!: §0305-4~79(97)00030-2 Hospital-made diet versus commercial supplement in postburn nutritional support Frema Dhanraj, Ashok Chacko, Mary Mammen and Ravindra Bharathi Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Christian Medical College and Hospital, VeLlore 632 004, Tamil Nadu, Tndia Therfore nutritional support is as important as any Nutritional sqort is mz imporfant aspect of the mamgenrent o,f other aspect of burns management. Nutritional burl7 ptif37fs. ,xLftritioil quple~~zenfation cm be ackie-Jed eithcv support following burns can be achieved by either by ‘kospital-Fmde i;Y ‘commercial diets. Carnmevcial diets are enteral or parenteral routes. Parenteral nutrition is $icacicIks but cx,vensioc arld smetimes not easily available. This usually avoided because of its expense and the high study was undevtaken to compare the #ic~zcy rind tolerance 0,f a rate of complications. Enteral nutrition can be given hos@i-made diet with a commercial diet. Twenty patients ivith by either ‘hospital-made’ or ‘commercial’ diets. harrzs ranging l’wn 20-50 per cent TBSA were s&died to Although commercial diets are efficacious they are conzynrr~ the efficacy and tolerance of the ‘hospital-made’ diet with expensive and sometimes not easily available. ‘cowmcrinl’ pmparatiorzs. Patients -were divided into two groups Hospital-made diets are cheap and the ingredients o/ IO each and randomised WifhipZ each group to yecceiz>e eifhcr a from which the diet is made are easily available. hosyital-made diet (j?vc patiellts) 07 a comnzevcial diet !fisIe However, the tolerance and efficacv of ‘hospital- patients). E~ficncy 0J’ diet was assessed by coaluntion of m&i- made’ diets compared to ‘commerciai’ diets are not iio~xd stnflls, gqft hdaz, number 0-f silrgicd p~oceduws Ned known. dzwation of iras@aZ stay. Tolemnce was assessed by recovdillg Therefore, the aims of the present study were to jidc @is suciz LIS ~aawza, mnitiq, abdomi~ad distclzfion and compare the tolerance and efficacy of ‘hospital-made’ :iiaruhwa. Bath diets mm well tolerated by all pntients. There diets with ‘commercial’ diets. was no signi,Ficunt diffemce in imiuitional sfatlks, wn~ber of suugicai proccdum, ~wcenfage of graft take and duration qf Method hospital stay 017 eitkev diet, suggesting that kos@al-made diets Subjects UYF similar in efficacy al7d fo~eravrce but cheaper UFld more easily Twenty patients with flame burns ranging between mailable. They are a good alternative to ‘commercial’ diets, 211 and 50 per cent body surface area, admitted to the especiai!y irz pow patients. 0 1997 Eiseuiev Sciem Lfd fur ISBI. Burn Unit of the Christian Medical College Hospital Kepords: Burns, enteral nutrition, hospital-made diet. (CMC), Vellore were studied. There were 11 males and 9 females and their ages ranged from 17 to 50 yr. Patients with diabetes mellitus, psychosis, renal Burns, VOL. 23, .Vo. 6, 512-514, 1997 failure and those admitted 3 days after the burn were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups depending Introduction on extent of burn injury. Group I (10 patients) had 2&35 per cent burns while Group II (10 patients) After burn injury, patients enter a severe catabolic had 36-50 per cent burns. Patients in each group state characterised by elevated metabohc rate, were randomised to receive either ‘hospital-made’ ancreased protein mobilisation and gluconeogenesis. (five patients) or ‘commercial’ diets (five patients). In burned patients these catabolic changes lead to significant increases in energy and protein require- Diets ments’. Weig.ht loss during this phase is virtually The composition of the ‘hospital-made’ and ‘commer- inevitable unless aggressive nutritional therapy is cial’ diets were similar (T&le I). Both diets were instituted soon after the burn. Weight loss of more prmepared in the dietary department, appeared similar than 10 per cent has been shown to increase and were packed in similar bottles. The diets were mortality and a weight loss of more than 30 per cent prepared twice a day and were stored in the ward’s is associated with almost 100 per cent mortality’. refrigerator prior to use. Dhanraj et al.: Postburn nutritional support 513 Table I. Compiticm of ‘hospital-made’ iliFt per 15011 ml Amount (g) CHO k/l Protein (g) Fat (gl Calories (Kcals) Hospital made Cottage cheese 375 2.1 32.0 36.4 464 Eggs (Nos) 3 19.8 19.8 255 Malted ragi * 20 15.9 1.2 0.2 70 Ragi flour 80 63.6 5.0 1.0 280 Sugar 55 55.0 220 Refined Oil 25 - 25.0 225 Total 136.6 58.0 82.4 1514 Commercial 132.1 57.3 83.6 1515 *Ragi is a millet (Eleusine coracana). Feeding regimen once a week. Total protein, albumin, serum trans- Tlw cahric requirement for each patient was ferrin and total lymphocyte count were measured at estimated using the Curreri formula’. Diets were fed admission and repeated after 2 weeks and at as continuous infusions over 24 h. All patients were discharge. fed buttermilk on the first postburn day at 50 ml/h Standard burn management was carried out on all through a I4 Fr size nasogastric tube. The tip of the patients. Fluid resuscitation was performed according tube was positioned in the antrum of the stomach. to a modified Brooke formula’. Cultures of urine, Aspiration was performed every 4 h to exclude reten- blood and intravenous catheter tips were taken when tion. Half strength burn formula diet (BFD), at the necessary and appropriate antibiotics administered rate of 50 ml/h, was started on second postburn day depending on the culture and sensitivity reports. and increased to 100 ml/h on third postburn day. Full Wounds were dressed with silver sulfadiazine and strength burn formula diet at the rate of 100 ml/h eschar debrided in the ward. Patients were taken for was given from the fourth day and increased by skin grafting when granulation was healthy. Early SO ml/h per day until the full caloric requirement was excision was not performed. reached. Patients wt’re allowed to eat solid food from The efficacy of the burn formula feeds were day 111. The daily intake of energy and protein from assessed by improvement in nutritional status, graft solid food were calculated by a dietitian and appro- take, number of surgical procedures required and priate reduct.ion of BFD was made according to the duration of stay. The study protocol was approved amount ot solid food consumed’. Both groups of by the Research Committee of the Christian Medical patients were on bed rest with minimal activity, such College, Vellore. as walking in the room and mild exercises to prevent contractures. Statistical method Tolerance of diet was assessed by recording side- Comparison of study parameters between two diets effects for 12xample nausea, vomiting, abdominal was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. distension and diarrhoeas. If patients complained of Data were analysed using SPSS PC+ software. any of the above, the volume of the feed was reduced anJ increased gradually to the calculated Results requirement. Ihhlc II shows that age, sex, per cent surface area of Nutritional status evaluation and burn burn, weight at admission and energy and protein management intake were similar in patients fed with ‘hospital- made’ and ‘commercial’ diets in the two groups Cljnical and biochemical parameters were used to studied. Hospital-made and commercial feeds were evaluate nutritional status. Patients were weighed well tolerated by all patients in the study with no Table II. Patient char
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.