Filetype PDF | Posted on 06 Jan 2023 | 2 years ago
Authentication
digital resources
206x Filetype PDF File size 1.17 MB Source: link.springer.com
Chen et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2021) 21:313
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06014-w
RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access
Nutritional risk screening score as an
independent predictor of nonventilator
hospital-acquired pneumonia: a cohort
study of 67,280 patients
1,2 2 3 3 2 2 2
Zhihui Chen , Hongmei Wu , Jiehong Jiang , Kun Xu , Shengchun Gao , Le Chen , Haihong Wang and
Xiuyang Li1*
Abstract
Background: Currently, the association of nutritional risk screening score with the development of nonventilator
hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) is unknown. This study investigated whether nutritional risk screening score
is an independent predictor of NV-HAP.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between September 2017 and June 2020 in a tertiary
hospital in China. The tool of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) was used for nutritional risk screening. A
total score of ≥3 indicated a patient was “at nutritional risk.” Logistic regression was applied to explore the
association between the NRS score and NV-HAP.
Results: A total of 67,280 unique patients were included in the study. The incidence of NV-HAP in the cohort for
the NRS<3 and≥3 NRS group was 0.4% (232/62702) and 2.6% (121/4578), respectively. In a multivariable logistic
regression model adjusted for all of the covariates, per 1-point increase in the NRS score was associated with a 30%
higher risk of NV-HAP (OR=1.30; 95%CI:1.19–1.43). Similarly, patients with NRS score ≥3 had a higher risk of NV-
HAP with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.06 (confidence interval (CI): 1.58–2.70) than those with NRS score <3. Subgroup
analyses indicated that the association between the NRS score and the risk of NV-HAP was similar for most strata.
Furthermore, the interaction analyses revealed no interactive role in the association between NRS score and NV-
HAP.
Conclusion: NRS score is an independent predictor of NV-HAP, irrespective of the patient’s characteristics. NRS-2002
has the potential as a convenient tool for risk stratification of adult hospitalized patients with different NV-HAP risks.
Keywords: Malnutrition, Screening, Hospital-acquired pneumonia, Aspiration pneumonia, Cohort study
* Correspondence: lixiuyang@zju.edu.cn
1
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Centre for Clinical Big
Data Statistics, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University College of
Medicine, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, China
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
©The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the
data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Chen et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2021) 21:313 Page 2 of 10
Introduction Methods
Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is one of the Data sources and study population
most frequent types of healthcare-associated infec- We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including
tions (HAIs) [1]. It includes two distinct subgroups: all inpatients admitted between September 1, 2017,
nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV- through June 30, 2020, at Wenzhou People’s Hospital
HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). (a 1500-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Zhejiang,
Currently, more than two-thirds of HAP cases are of China). Patients who were pregnant, younger than 18
theNV-HAPtype[2, 3]. Although both NV-HAP years of age or greater than 90years of age, length of
and VAP impose enormous clinical and economic hospital stay <48h, received mechanical ventilation
burdens clinical and economic burdens [4–6], evi- during hospitalization, and lack of nutritional risk
dence suggests that NV-HAP has higher overall screening score were excluded from the analysis. If
medical costs and greater overall mortality than VAP patients were readmitted during the study period,
[6]. However, literature concerning NV-HAP is rare. only their first admission was considered. The study
Most studies and prevention strategies targeting was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of
HAP have primarily focused on VAP [2]. Studies Wenzhou people’s Hospital [approval no.
have revealed that modifiable risk factors, such as WRY2018070]. Given the retrospective nature of the
swallowing evaluation and oral care, can reduce the study, the requirement of informed consent was
risk of NV-HAP [7, 8]. Therefore, the search for waived. This paper was reported in line with the
additional modifiable risk factors of NV-HAP is STROBE guidelines [20].
urgently needed.
Factors thought to be influencing NV-HAP have Nutritional risk screening (NRS)
been explored in several studies [9, 10], were most All adult patients, except pregnant women, underwent
patient-related risk factors associated with an in- nutritional risk screening. The nutritional risk screening
creased NV-HAP morbidity cannot be corrected [7, was performed within 24h after admission by ward
11]. Malnutrition, as an important risk factor for nursing staff who were trained to conduct using the
HAIs [12], is highly prevalent in hospitalized adult NRS-2002 tool.
patients. The prevalence of malnutrition ranges from
20 to 50% in hospitalized patients [13]. With appro- Outcome
priate nutritional support therapy, malnutrition is po- The NV-HAP data was obtained from the Xinglin sys-
tentially reversible. The nutritional support therapy is tem [21]. This system is a web-based, real-time monitor-
therefore becoming an appealing target for prevention ing system of nosocomial infection, which automatically
and management of HAIs, including the NV-HAP identify symptoms of infections and clinical data such as
[14]. To identify important nutritional targets, the fever, positive bacterial culture, and elevated inflamma-
association between nutritional risk and NV-HAP tory response markers for initial diagnoses. Meanwhile,
should be explored. the system is also used to transfer nosocomial infection
The NRS-2002 is a validated tool for nutritional cases identified by the clinicians to senior infection con-
screening of patients between 18 to 90years of age trol practitioner for a definitive diagnosis. In case of a
who have or are at risk of malnutrition. The tool in- disagreement between the two sides, a consensus was
cludes standard screening parameters, such as body made via discussions. Nonventilator hospital-acquired
mass index (BMI), patient’s age, weight loss, dietary pneumonia (NV-HAP) is defined as a pneumonia not
intake, and severity of underlying disease [15]. The present or incubating at the time of hospital admission
NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, and a total score and occurring at least 48h after admission in patients
of ≥3 indicates that a patient is “at nutritional risk”. not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation during
This tool has been confirmed and validated by several hospitalization [22]. The diagnostic criteria used in the
studies worldwide and is widely used for screening present study for NV-HAP strictly adhered to the 2018
hospitalized patients who are nutritionally at risk version of the Chinese guidelines [22]. The 2018 version
[16–18]. Several studies have identified the nutritional of the Chinese guidelines is compatible with the guide-
risk screening (NRS) score as an independent pre- lines issued by the American Thoracic Society [23].
dictor of HAIs [12], such as surgical site infections
[19]. However, no longitudinal data concerning the Covariates
the association of NRS score with the risk of NV- Admission data collected from the electronic medical
HAP. record system included age; sex; drinking status; smok-
Thus, we investigated the relationship between nutri- ing status, comorbidities, admission category, Barthel
tional risk screening scores and NV-HAP.P. Index, Morse Fall Scale, and season of admission. The
Chen et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2021) 21:313 Page 3 of 10
Barthel Index (BI) [24] and the Morse Fall Scale [25] performed using the generalized estimation equation
were used to assess the patient’s level of independence (GEE) method with a logit link and exchangeable correl-
and nursing-related complications, respectively. Charl- ation matrix while adjusting for the possible dependence
son comorbidity index (CCI) was used to measure the in the outcome introduced by repeated admissions. Fi-
burden of comorbid conditions [26]. nally, to assess the homogeneity of effects, subgroup
Based on the outcome and exposure to the hospital analyses and interaction tests were performed for the co-
environment, we added a covariate termed “time at risk” variates shown in Table 1.
into the model. For NV-HAP patients, “time at risk” was Statistical analyses were performed with the R software
calculated as the number of days between the admission (version 3.4.3; http://www.R-project.org) and Empower-
day and date of diagnosis of NV-HAP. For non-NV- Stats software (www.empowerstats.com, X&Y solutions,
HAP patients, the “time at risk” corresponded to the Inc. Boston MA). A two-tailed P-value of ≤0.05 was con-
total hospital days. We collected information from the sidered to be statistically significant.
Xinglin system concerning clinical procedures (including
a central venous catheter, indwelling urinary catheter, Results
surgery, parenteral nutrition, and enteral tube feeding), Study participants and baseline characteristics
other nosocomial infections, and the use of specific clas- There were 154,024 admissions to the medical centre
ses of medications such as antacids, sedatives, nonsteroi- from September 1, 2017, through June 30, 2020. After
dal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), systemic steroid, excluding admissions with younger than 18years of age
inhaled steroid, and anticoagulant during the “time at or greater than 90years of age (n=13,491), length of
risk” period. hospital stay < 48h (n=9207), received mechanical ven-
tilation during hospitalization (n =1658), pregnancy (n=
Statistical analysis 37,891), lack of nutritional risk screening score (n=173),
Non-normal continuous variables were presented as me- and repeated admissions (n=24,324), a total of 67,280
dians (Q1-Q3) and compared using Mann-Whitney U unique patients were included in the final analysis
test. Categorical variables were presented as numbers (Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics of study participants by
(proportion) and compared using Chi-square test or NRS score are listed in Table 1. In the present study,
Fisher’s exact test. To avoid bias caused by missing NRS 4578 (6.8%) patients were at nutritional risk (NRS-
score data, the characteristics of individuals with missing 2002≥3). There were significant differences in baseline
data were compared with those with complete data. As characteristics between patients with NRS score<3 and
less than 1% of the covariates were missing, the missing those with NRS score≥3 (Table 1).
data were not dealt with. Logistic regression analyses
were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confi- The incidence of NV-HAP according to NRS scores
dence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between The incidence of NV-HAP in the cohort for the NRS <3
NRS score and risk of NV-HAP. Firstly, possible collin- group and NRS score≥3 group was 0.4% (232/62702)
earity was assessed based on the variance inflation factor and 2.6% (121/4578), respectively (Table 1). The propor-
(VIF); variables with VIF>10 were removed from the tion of patients with NV-HAP was significantly higher in
Model. Secondly, we used four different logistic regres- the NRS ≥3 groups (Fig. 2a). The incidence of NV-HAP
sion models to examine the associations of nutritional showed an NRS score-dependent increase (P for trend<
risk screening score and the risk for NV-HAP. The Non- 0.001). The incidence of NV-HAP was 0.2, 0.8, 1.1, 2.3,
adjusted Model examined the association between NRS 2.5, 4.7, and 15.1% for NRS scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,5, and ≥
score and NV-HAP without adjustment for any covari- 6, respectively (Fig. 2b).
ates. Model I included demographic characteristics (age
and sex). Model II made an additional adjustment for Relationship between NRS score and NV-HAP
variables that, when added to this model, changed in ef- Results of VIF analysis for variables showed that there
fect estimate of more than 10% [27], included the covari- was no collinearity bias (Table S1 in the Supplementary
ates in Model I plus stroke, Charlson comorbidity index, Appendix). The unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted
time of risk, central venous catheter, enteral tube feed- analyses of the relationship between NRS score and NV-
ing, Barthel Index, Morse Fall Scale. The association of HAP are shown in Table 2. NRS score, whether
each covariate with NV-HAP is shown in Supplementary considered a categorical or continuous variable, was in-
Table S2. Model III (the fully adjusted model) included dependently associated with the risk of NV-HAP in dif-
the covariates in Model II plus the other covariates listed ferent multivariate logistic regression models. Patients
in Table 1. Thirdly, these analyses were performed on with NRS score≥3 were at a higher risk of NV-HAP
unique patients, making it possible for a patient with (OR=7.31; 95%CI: 5.86, 9.31) than those with NRS
multiple admissions; therefore, risk estimation was also score was <3. After adjusting for age and sex (Model I),
Chen et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2021) 21:313 Page 4 of 10
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population
Demographics Total (n=67,280) NRS score<3 (n=62,702) NRS score≥3(n=4578) P value
Age (years), median (Q1-Q3) 51 (37–65) 50 (37–64) 68 (43–78) <0.001
Male, n (%) 28,684 (42.6) 26,499 (42.3) 2185 (47.7) <0.001
Drinking status, n (%) <0.001
Never drinker 57,117 (84.9) 53,246 (84.9) 3871 (84.5)
Current drinker 7802 (11.6) 7346 (11.7) 456 (10.0)
Former drinker 2119 (3.1) 1890 (3.0) 229 (5.0)
Missing 242(0.4) 220 (0.4) 22 (0.5)
Smoking status, n (%) <0.001
never smoker 55,266 (82.1) 51,584 (82.3) 3682 (80.4)
Current smoker 8634 (12.9) 8092 (12.9) 542 (11.8)
Former smoker 3230 (4.8) 2886 (4.6) 344 (7.6)
Missing 150(0.2) 140 (0.2) 10 (0.2)
Comorbidities, n (%)
COPD 803 (1.2) 651 (1.0) 152 (3.3) <0.001
Swallow disability 126 (0.2) 63 (0.1) 63 (1.4) <0.001
Stroke 7237 (10.8) 6072 (9.7) 1165 (25.4) <0.001
Diabetes mellitus 9612 (14.3) 8805 (14.0) 807 (17.6) <0.001
Peptic ulcer disease 2236 (3.3) 2128 (3.4) 108 (2.4) <0.001
Moderate or severe renal disease 2944 (4.4) 2733 (4.4) 211 (4.6) 0.424
Liver disease 11,993 (17.8) 11,560 (18.4) 433 (9.5) <0.001
Congestive heart failure 328 (0.5) 284 (0.5) 44 (1.0) <0.001
Solid tumour 4962 (7.4) 4272 (6.8) 690 (15.1) <0.001
CCI (points), median (Q1- Q3) 1 (0–3) 1 (0–3) 4 (1–5) <0.001
Time of risk (days), median (Q1- Q3) 7 (4–10) 7 (4–10) 10 (6–16) <0.001
Admission category, n (%) <0.001
Internal medicine 27,769 (41.3) 25,487 (40.6) 2282 (49.8)
Surgery 19,556 (29.1) 18,110 (28.9) 1446 (31.6)
Gynaecology 15,548 (23.1) 15,084 (24.1) 464 (10.1)
Emergency department 3172 (4.7) 2902 (4.6) 270 (5.9)
ICU 203 (0.3) 137 (0.2) 66 (1.4)
Others 1032 (1.5) 982 (1.6) 50 (1.1)
Clinical procedure, n (%)
Central venous catheter 1762 (2.6) 1294 (2.1) 468 (10.2) <0.001
Indwelling urinary catheter 13,823 (20.5) 12,972 (20.7) 851 (18.6) <0.001
Surgery 20,979 (31.2) 20,161 (32.2) 818 (17.9) <0.001
Parenteral nutrition 1479 (2.2) 1077 (1.7) 402 (8.8) <0.001
Enteral tube feeding 5698 (8.5) 4849 (7.7) 849 (18.5) <0.001
Barthel Index, n (%) <0.001
Independent 43,273 (64.3) 41,706 (66.5) 1567 (34.2)
Slight dependency 6057 (9.0) 5601 (8.9) 456 (10.0)
Moderate dependency 10,085 (15.0) 9109 (14.5) 976 (21.3)
Severe dependency 6495 (9.7) 5461 (8.7) 1034 (22.6)
Total dependency 1370 (2.0) 825 (1.3) 545 (11.9)
Morse Fall Scale, n (%) <0.001
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.
