201x Filetype PDF File size 0.58 MB Source: med.virginia.edu
NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #209 NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #209 Carol Rees Parrish, MS, RDN, Series Editor Enteral Nutrition in the Adult Short Bowel Patient: A Potential Path to Central Line Freedom Carol Rees Parrish Andrew P. Copland Short bowel syndrome/intestinal failure (SBS/IF) is characterized by patients who have lost absorptive surface area in the gut either due to structural (e.g. surgical) or functional (e.g. mucosal disease) changes and demonstrate an inability to maintain both hydration and nutritional well- being while eating and drinking a normal diet. While the use of enteral nutrition is part of primary therapy in the pediatric SBS population, it is underutilized in adult patients trying to transition off parenteral nutrition. Instead, adult SBS patients are sometimes left on chronic parenteral hydration or nutrition. This article will address how one institution orchestrates an enteral feeding trial in the adult SBS patient trying to achieve enteral autonomy from parenteral support. INTRODUCTION hort bowel syndrome/intestinal failure of vascular access are also significant. Effective (SBS/IF) is best defined as an inability to and aggressive care of the SBS patient requires Smaintain adequate nutrition and/or hydration a thoughtful approach to maximizing GI tract through oral intake due to insufficient gut surface function and eliminating the need for parenteral area either from surgical resection or a significantly support whenever possible. defunctionalized bowel surface (e.g. radiation While enteral nutrition (EN) is widely used in 1-4 injury, etc.). Many patients require parenteral pediatric SBS patients in an attempt to transition nutrition (PN) or hydration due to the severity from PN to enteral autonomy, it appears to be rarely of malabsorption and/or dehydration present. used in adult SBS patients. Getting the most out Not only does this pose significant lifestyle and of a shortened bowel means not only providing financial challenges, but the medical risks of luminal nutrients to maximize absorption and the catheter infection, thrombosis, and gradual loss adaptation process,5 but also means incorporating creative strategies such as using the GI tract at a Carol Rees Parrish MS, RDN Nutrition time when it would normally be in disuse (i.e., Support Specialist University of Virginia during sleep). This allows delivery of nutrients Health System Digestive Health Center at a slower pace for gradual absorption without Charlottesville, VA Andrew P. Copland, MD overwhelming the vulnerable GI tract. This article Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of will address how one institution orchestrates an Gastroenterology and Hepatology University EN trial in the adult SBS patient trying to achieve of Virginia Health System Charlottesville, VA enteral autonomy from parenteral support. 36 PRACTICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY APRIL 2021 Enteral Nutrition in the Adult Short Bowel Patient NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #209 NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #209 Adaptation Phase After Loss of Bowel SBS diet education materials for patients go to: After a massive loss of bowel, the remaining bowel med.virginia.edu/ginutrition/patient-education. attempts to boost absorption of nutrients and fluids through hypertrophy of the villous mucosa. While Enteral Feeding Considerations maximal adaptation is usually reached within in the Adult Short Bowel Patient the first 6 months after resection, some bowel Available supportive evidence for using EN in adaptation will continue for up to two years. During adult SBS patients with varying lengths of small the adaptation phase, enteral nutrients directly bowel consists of case reports, case series and small 9-20 stimulate: observational studies. • Enteral blood flow Feeding Route • Epithelial cells Gastric delivery is favored over jejunal feeding, not • Production of trophic hormones only to stimulate pancreaticobiliary secretions to assimilate nutrients, but to encompass the greatest • Pancreaticobiliary secretions amount of surface area for absorption and to better regulate flow across the pylorus into the In so doing, mucosal atrophy is prevented, small bowel. Jejunal feeding should be reserved mucosal barrier function is preserved, and the for those patients with functional or mechanical mucosal immune system is downregulated.5-7 gastric outlet obstruction, severe ongoing gastric Recognizing that nutrients in the GI tract stimulate reflux, or anatomy that prevents gastric feeding. this process is key to understanding intestinal However, this would only be appropriate in those adaptation. To maximize intestinal adaptation, patients with adequate jejunal/ileal surface area it is important to provide early introduction of below the jejunal feeding tube ports to absorb whole, enterally delivered nutrients (either as infused nutrients. food or polymeric formula). Whole nutrients help maximize the functional workload of the intestinal Continuous vs. Bolus Enteral Infusion epithelium which drives intestinal adaptation (think Pump feeding is preferred to bolus feeding to use it or lose it). Utilizing the gut overnight may present nutrients slowly over time to maximize have the added benefit of avoiding overstimulation nutrient contact and saturation of mucosal receptors of the bowel by presenting nutrients slowly via a resulting in overall improved absorption per unit 1 pump maximizing uptake at the brush border. length of small bowel. Delivery of EN via a pump It is absolutely critical in caring for the newly is vastly slower than the slowest/smallest amount minted SBS patient to allow time for adaptation of food or fluid taken orally; consider: 60mL/ before committing a patient to “long-term or hour = 1mL/minute (a teaspoon [5mL] infused PERMANENT TPN.” Patients may see significant over 5 minutes). Several studies have shown improvements in bowel function as the adaptation improved outcomes (nutrient absorption, weight window closes which could facilitate weaning of gain, less diarrhea, less divalent cation loss), with previously necessary parenteral support. As with continuous infusion in both pediatric and adult SBS any post-op GI patient, oral/enteral nutrients populations.4,13-16,18,21,22 In the patient consuming should be started as soon as feasible, to initiate a short bowel diet over the course of the day, the intestinal adaption process, even if oral intake is nocturnal pump feedings over 8-12 hours at night not sufficient, or needs to be kept to a minimum to have the advantage of using the GI tract when there prevent high output. Oral intake enlists the cephalic is no competition for the mucosal receptors, leaving phase of digestion activating salivary glands and nutrients their very own contact time. For those stimulation of epidermal growth factor secretion who want to infuse during the day and tolerate and other trophic agents in saliva that also may the increased daytime enteral workload, an enteral 2,8 play a role in adaptation. Finally, oral intake backpack can be used to carry the infusion pump is a very important component in the quality of so patients can continue their normal activities as life of our patients. For our institution’s written desired (“infuse and cruise” as it were). PRACTICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY APRIL 2021 37 Enteral Nutrition in the Adult Short Bowel Patient NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #209 Enteral Product Selection metabolism generates useful free fatty acids. In the early studies of enteral feeding in pediatric However, patients with concurrent small intestinal SBS, elemental or semi-elemental formulas were bacterial overgrowth may find that fiber exacerbates often used based on the assumption that the injured, gas and distension. This can be worsened in some shortened intestinal tract needed help to absorb patients by the addition of fructo-oligosaccharides 25,26 nutrients by having them partially or fully broken (FOS) in some of the enteral products. down. While there is evidence in animal studies As enteral formulas are known to be relatively that more complex nutrients promote adaptation, low in sodium content, SBS patients with end human studies have been small, hence clear benefit jejunostomies or ileostomies may need additional 27 of polymeric vs. elemental formulas is not available salt added directly to their EN prior to infusion 13,14,20,23,24 at this time. Elemental-type formulas tend if they do not get enough salt in their diet. Those to be more osmotic and costly. The whole nutrients with a colon should not need this as even a small in polymeric formulas also provide the necessary colon segment avidly absorbs sodium from the gut. 5 “workload” to maximally stimulate adaptation. Finally, there may be a few patients who only See Table 1 for a comparison of various standard need hydration rather than additional nutrition polymeric vs. elemental-type formulas. support. Oral rehydration infused over time via Fiber-containing products may be useful in a gastrostomy tube may effectively hydrate and 28 those SBS patients with a colon segment as colon allow freedom from the risks of a central line. Table 1. Fat Content of Elemental, Semi-Elemental and Low Fat Enteral Formulas Formula Calories/ g Fat/ % MCT g fat/ g fat/ mOsm/ mL Liter 1000 kcal 2000 kcal Liter Elemental Peptamen® 1.0 39 70 39.0 78 270 Peptamen 1.5® 1.5 56 70 37.3 74.6 550 Peptamen AF 1.2® 1.2 54 50 45 90 390 Peptamen Intense 1.0 HP® 1.0 38 50 38 76 345 Perative® 1.3 37.3 40 28.6 57.2 385 Vital 1.0® 1.0 38.1 47 38.1 76.2 411 Vital AF 1.2® 1.2 54 45 29 58 459 Vital 1.5® 1.5 57.1 47 38 76 610 ® 50 46.4 419 Vital HP 1.0 23.2 23.2 Vivonex RTF® 1.0 11.6 40 11.6 23.2 630 Vivonex T.E.N. Powder 1.0 3 0 3 6 630 Vivonex Plus Powder 1.0 25 0 25 50 650 Standard Polymeric ® 19 52 340 Promote 1.0 26 26 Replete® 1.0 34 20 34 68 300 Isosource 1.0 HP® 1.2 40 20 32 64 330 Osmolite 1.5® 1.5 49 19 32 64 525 Nutren 1.5, unflavored® 1.5 60 20 40 80 530 38 PRACTICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY APRIL 2021 Enteral Nutrition in the Adult Short Bowel Patient NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #209 Blended Whole Food Formulas fat polymeric formula: Replete @ 110mL/hr In a small study of 10 pediatric patients with x 6 cans. While this dropped his total daily intestinal failure (80% with colon in continuity), EN calories from 2250kcal to 1500kcal, it also transition from an elemental to a commercial reduced the total fat content from 84g to 50g/ blended formula (Compleat Pediatric®) resulted day; his weight stabilized at 120 lbs and he in more formed stools and appropriate weight gain experienced a decrease in his 24-hour stool 24 after one year. output, demonstrating improved absorption on less total fat. Lower Fat Formulas Might be Worth a Try Be wary of exchanging medium chain in Some Patients (especially those with a colon) triglycerides (MCT) for long chain triglycerides In general, avoid restricting fat intake because of the (LCT). Too much MCT can overwhelm a SBS caloric density fat provides. However, some patients patient's ability to passively absorb it and still with SBS have significant fat malabsorption, result in significant fat malabsorption. In our which may be worsened by a coexisting bile salt experience, the use of MCTs should be reserved insufficiency, or the increasingly more common for SBS patients with colon in continuity, and then pancreatic exocrine asynchrony from altered upper only if clear clinical benefit is demonstrated in an gut anatomy such as a Roux en y gastric bypass. individual patient. Using a lower total fat formula in these cases may In a patient with SBS, lower osmolality improve overall absorption, particularly in patients products may be helpful, but this benefit is often with colon in continuity. Case in point: minimal given the extensive dilution effect of both baseline gastric and intestinal secretions with any 32 year-old male with history of SBS due to gastric formula infused. The bottom line is any necrotizing enterocolitis as an infant (~ 30cm enteral product that clearly drives stool/ostomy proximal SB anastomosed to ~ 50cm of distal output above what is tenable for an individual colon); transferred to the adult service when patient is not sustainable. he was 24 years of age. Therapy at that time Additionally, poorly absorbed osmoles are included: PN, nocturnal semi-elemental EN via significant contributors to diarrhea in any patient, gastrostomy tube, and an oral short bowel diet especially patients with SBS. Liquid medications (followed fairly well). His usual body weight containing sugar alcohols (see Table 2) and enteral fluctuated for years between 95-105 lbs (height products containing FOS have been shown to 25,26,29 4’ 10”). After numerous central line septic increase stool volume. episodes, he was transitioned off PN to daily nocturnal IV fluids/electrolytes alone (he could Who Needs an Enteral Feeding Trial? not hydrate himself without), nocturnal EN, Once out of the adaptation phase, every SBS and optimized oral SBS diet and fluids during patient that is PN-dependent as well as every SBS the day. When teduglutide became available, patient that is struggling with nutrition/hydration he was started on it in an effort to get him off on oral intake alone, should be considered for novel IV fluids. His weight increased over time to approaches to maximize current function of their an all-time high of 124 lbs (goal weight was GI tract. 110 lbs., but patient started working out and Although there are some patients that have a wanted to weigh 120 lbs.). Urine and stool low probability of success, there is no downside output averaged 900-1100mL (never a kidney to trying to liberate a patient from PN or IV fluids stone), and 1500-2000mL, respectively. Given and central line access. Situations that may be his weight gain, and the fact it was over goal, considered relative “contraindications” are high ® it was decided to switch him from Peptamen output fistula on maximum medication therapy 1.5 @ 110mL/hr x 6 cans for years to a lower (antidiarrheals, antisecretory, etc.), chronic dysmotility, chronic obstruction, and severe practicalgastro.com (> 2000mL/day) diarrhea output. (continued on page 46) PRACTICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY APRIL 2021 39
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.