jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Economics Pdf 125762 | E6 29 30


 182x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.39 MB       Source: www.eolss.net


File: Economics Pdf 125762 | E6 29 30
economics interactions with other discplines engineering economics thomas o boucher engineering economics thomas o boucher department of industrial systems engineering rutgers university usa keywords capital budgeting technology selection productivity and ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 11 Oct 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
                  ECONOMICS INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER DISCPLINES - Engineering Economics - Thomas O. Boucher 
                  ENGINEERING ECONOMICS 
                   
                  Thomas O. Boucher 
                  Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Rutgers University, USA 
                   
                  Keywords: Capital budgeting, technology selection, productivity and technical change, 
                  cost estimation, cost-benefit analysis, public sector projects, risk and uncertainty, 
                  sustainable systems. 
                   
                  Contents 
                   
                  1. Introduction - Engineering, Economics and Society 
                  2. Principles of Engineering Project Evaluation           
                  3. Overview of Typical Capital Budgeting Problem Types 
                  4. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Public Sector Projects 
                  5. Considering Uncertainty in the Estimates of Cash Flows 
                  6. Judgmental and Irreducible Factors in Engineering Project Analysis 
                  7. Engineering Economics and Sustainable Systems 
                  Glossary 
                  Bibliography 
                  Biographical Sketch 
                   
                  Summary 
                    
                  Engineering Economics is the application of economic principles to the evaluation of 
                  engineering design and the selection of technical alternatives in engineering projects.  
                  Key decision making tools for evaluating the economics of engineering projects were 
                  originated by two 19th century professional engineers: Arthur Wellington in the railroad 
                  industry and Jules Dupuis in public sector civil engineering projects.  Their original 
                  works have been extended and augmented over the years by engineers and economists 
                  and  are  widely  applied  today  to  justify  the  financial  and  economic  efficacy  of 
                  engineering projects. 
                   
                  Engineers apply science and technology in designing products and processes.  Through 
                  innovation,  research  and  development,  and  engineering  design,  an  array  of  new 
                  technologies become available to society over time.  Some of these technologies will be 
                  used and some will not.  Understanding the economic characteristics of a technology 
                  and  its  costs  is  what  distinguishes  engineering  economics  from  other  branches  of 
                  economics and finance.   
                   
                  Engineers working in the private economy select the combination of product designs, 
                  fabrication materials, and manufacturing process technologies that will minimize cost 
                  while achieving the desired product quality and price necessary to insure the anticipated 
                  product demand.  Through this process of cost minimization, profits are maximized and 
                  the  economic  decision  making  process  is  consistent  with  the  firm’s  fiduciary 
                  responsibility of providing maximum financial return to the stockholder.  Engineers 
                  working in the public sector are faced with a more complex situation.  They are usually 
                  required to account for the benefits that will accrue to the community as a whole as a 
                  ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) 
           ECONOMICS INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER DISCPLINES - Engineering Economics - Thomas O. Boucher 
           result  of  the  proposed  project.  They  must  also  account  for  social  costs,  such  as 
           environmental damage, that may occur as a result of undertaking the proposed project.  
           This commonly occurs in the work of civil engineers.   This chapter describes the 
           problems faced by engineers making economic decisions in private industry and in the 
           public sector and illustrates the analytical frameworks used. 
            
           1. Introduction - Engineering, Economics and Society 
            
           The engineer is a designer and a builder.  The engineer applies science and technology 
           in order to design products and systems that are useful to society.  Typical examples are 
           the  design  of  a  new  machine,  the  selection  of  a  technology  for  the  design  of  a 
           manufacturing process, the design of a system to capture usable energy from a natural 
           energy source, and the design of an algorithm for a software product.   
               
           Usually engineers work for industrial firms and the firms wish to sell these designs, 
           products, and technical solutions to their customers.  The firm is the institutional linkage 
           between the problem solving done by the engineers and having it fulfill social needs 
           through the mechanism of the marketplace.  This leads us to a general definition of 
           engineering.  An engineer is a person who applies science and technology in designing 
           products and processes to address social needs.  It is the last part of this definition, 
           “…to address social needs” that links engineering to economics. 
               
           Economics is often defined simply as the study of how humans use scarce resources to 
           produce various commodities and distribute them to members of the society for their 
           consumption.  The engineer is a primary actor in finding the best way to “…use scarce 
           resources to produce various commodities…”  In particular it is the engineers’ goal to 
           use resources of lesser economic value in order to produce products and systems of 
           greater economic value.    
               
           Neoclassical economists have shown that the only observable measure of “value” is 
           price.  The price (value) of a commodity or a product results from the interaction of 
           supply and demand for that commodity.  The marketplace distributes resources and 
           goods based on the “implied social value” indicated by the price.  Engineers, through 
           design and manufacture, convert commodities and resources of lower price (value) to 
           products  of  higher  price  (value).    Thus,  for  example,  silicon  (sand)  is  transformed 
           through manufacturing processes to obtain a computer chip, which is worth much more 
           than the input material (sand) and the power consumption and machinery usage that 
           goes into producing it.  If an engineering design converts resources and commodities of 
           higher value into a product or system of lower value, it is a failure of engineering. 
               
           Engineering  economics  is  closely  linked  to  the  underlying  principles  of 
           microeconomics.    Microeconomics  is  the  study  of  economic  units,  such  as  firms, 
           households,  and  consumers  determining  value  through  buying  and  selling  in  the 
           marketplace.  The “market” is the arbiter of value through its price setting role and the 
           engineer must respect price signals to ensure that the proposed design or manufacturing 
           process provides an increase in value to the society. When the engineer is working 
           outside of the normal influence of the marketplace, it is more difficult to objectively 
           judge  his  or  her  success.    For  example,  engineers  work  in  the  public  sector  on 
           ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) 
           ECONOMICS INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER DISCPLINES - Engineering Economics - Thomas O. Boucher 
           infrastructure programs, in military contractor industries, and for government labs.  In 
           these cases there is no social marketplace for buying and selling the new designs and 
           products.    In the public sector, the output of the engineer’s work may be a specification 
           for a public transportation system, a levee or water control system, or a fighter aircraft, 
           among others. There is no readily available market pricing to determine the value of the 
           output.  Contrast this with designing and building a new oil drilling platform.  In this 
           latter case the value of the design can be estimated directly from the price of oil and the 
           increase in yield or higher pumping rate of the new design.  It is more difficult to assess 
           the economic value that flows from the public transportation system (will the public use 
           it?) or the effectiveness of a new fighter aircraft design (what is its value to society?). In 
           effect, it is more difficult for the engineer to know that the output of his/her effort will 
           be of greater social value than the input. In these cases the practicing engineer will focus 
           on the minimal cost safe design that achieves the functional specifications of the product 
           or system.  When possible, engineers and government planners may attempt to estimate 
           the social benefit using artificial, market-like pricing schemes.  These will be discussed 
           later in Section 4. 
               
           The process of converting inputs to outputs just described is not simply a matter of 
           assembling  resources  and  combining  them  in  known  ways  to  create  an  output.  
           Engineers, along with their physics and mathematics colleagues, are engaged in creating 
           entirely new innovations through the process of research and development – a process 
           that  leads  to  what  is  called  “technical  change.”    Technology  is  broadly  defined  as 
           society’s  sum  total  of  knowledge  about  the  industrial  arts.    This  is  a  rather  vague 
           definition  since  technology  is  not  easy  to  measure  using  this  definition.    Technical 
           change, on the other hand, refers to an increase in the pool of technologies that are 
           being  used  by  industry.    This  is  easier  to  observe  empirically.    The  existence  of 
           technology  does  not  insure  its  adoption  by  industry.    Technical  change  takes 
           technology from the knowledge or prototype stage into the economic arena.  If the 
           pricing  mechanism  of  the  marketplace  and  the  investment  decision  processes  are 
           working properly, a new technology will be used only if it is economic to do so. 
               
           A concept related to technical change is “productivity.”  Industrial productivity is a 
           measure of the ratio of physical output produced to physical input used by a company or 
           industry.  The most common measure of industrial productivity is labor productivity, or 
           output  per  employee hour.  A high rate of labor productivity is  associated with  an 
           economy that produces more physical product per capita, or wealth per person, for the 
           members  of  its  society.  In  fact,  the  primary  way  that  an  industrial  or  agricultural 
           economy can increase the aggregate level of wealth for its citizens is by increasing 
           aggregate productivity.  
               
           High rates of industrial productivity are associated with high rates of technical change.  
           Several studies by economists have tried to measure the underlying forces that increase 
           industrial  productivity,  measured  as  output  per  worker-hour.   They  have  found  that 
           increases in industrial productivity cannot be accounted for simply by the substitution of 
           more capital equipment for labor (referred to as “capital deepening”).  Researchers have 
           found that a major part of the improvement in productivity comes from innovations in 
           methods  of  production  and  the  “quality”  of  capital  goods,  generally  referred  to  as 
           “technical change” (Solow, 1957; Boucher, 1981).  This process of technical change is 
           ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) 
           ECONOMICS INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER DISCPLINES - Engineering Economics - Thomas O. Boucher 
           not a linear process and it is subject at all points along the way to an economic test, 
           which is administered by engineers and managers working in their particular industries.  
           An example of the complexity of technical change and its relationship to productivity is 
           illustrated in Box 1a. 
               
           Box 1a illustrates many aspects of how technical change works its way through the 
           economy.  A new material which was invented for the light bulb industry in Germany in 
           the 1920s, tungsten-carbide, was adapted in a novel alloy, tungsten-titanium carbide, for 
           the design of cutting tools that could replace high speed steel in metalworking.  The new 
           material was thought to be capable of cutting metals at much higher speeds than existing 
           cutting tools.  However, these cutting tools would not be very productive when used in 
           existing machinery due to the inability to operate the existing machines at higher speeds 
           while  maintaining  tolerance  precision.    This  led  to  new  machine  designs  with  the 
           capability of running two to three times as fast as existing machines without vibration.  
           These machines started to become available in the 1940s and were adopted widely by 
           industry following World War II.  Subsequently, throughout the 1950s and 60s, the rate 
           of productivity in metalworking industries rose mostly due to technical change, which 
           began with the development of tungsten-carbide material in the 1920s. At each step in 
           the process described in Box 1a, there is an opportunity for an economic assessment of 
           an  investment.    The  metallurgists  and  technical  mangers  working  for  Osram,  the 
           German light bulb company, had to consider the investment of R&D resources and the 
           likelihood of a successful outcome in trying to replace diamond drawing tools with a 
           new, less  expensive material.  When Phillip McKenna created an alloy  of tungsten 
           carbide that could machine metals at high speeds, the potential market for this new 
           technology had to be evaluated before launching a new company based on it.  Similarly, 
           machine tool builders had to assess the economics of redesigning their equipment to 
           accommodate the new cutting tool technology.  Finally, engineers in the metalworking 
           industry (fabricated metal products, transportation equipment, machinery manufacture, 
           and instruments) were responsible for computing the economic advantage of replacing 
           existing  production  equipment  with  these  newer  machines.    From  research  and 
           development,  through  product  design,  through  adoption  of  new  technology  in 
           manufacturing processes, economics plays a key role in the decision process.  Along 
           this continuum there are engineers, scientists and technical mangers who must address 
           the  economics  of  these  decisions.  This  is  the  fundamental  purpose  of  engineering 
           economics.  It  should  be  pointed  out  that  increasing  productivity  is  not  the  direct 
           objective of the engineering economic decision process.  It is a derived effect.  The 
           engineering  economic  decision  process  will  substitute  newer  technologies  for  older 
           technologies  only  when  the  former  can  be  justified  economically.    For  example,  a 
           computer controlled machine tool will displace a semi-automatic machine tool only if it 
           is more cost effective for the given application.  As newer, more efficient technologies 
           prove  themselves  economically  and  displace  older  equipment,  output  will  naturally 
           increase  in  relation  to  the  amount  of  labor  used,  thus  creating  an  increase  in  labor 
           productivity.    The  increase  in  productivity  is  a  derived  effect  from  the  economic 
           decision-making process that chooses among technological alternatives based on the 
           criterion  of  the  minimization  of  combined  capital  and  operating  costs.  This  is  the 
           decision making process governed by the principles of engineering economics.  The 
           origins and methods of this decision making process will be described in Section 2. 
            
           ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) 
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Economics interactions with other discplines engineering thomas o boucher department of industrial systems rutgers university usa keywords capital budgeting technology selection productivity and technical change cost estimation benefit analysis public sector projects risk uncertainty sustainable contents introduction society principles project evaluation overview typical problem types considering in the estimates cash flows judgmental irreducible factors glossary bibliography biographical sketch summary is application economic to design alternatives key decision making tools for evaluating were originated by two th century professional engineers arthur wellington railroad industry jules dupuis civil their original works have been extended augmented over years economists are widely applied today justify financial efficacy apply science designing products processes through innovation research development an array new technologies become available time some these will be used not understa...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.