184x Filetype PDF File size 0.45 MB Source: saspublishers.com
Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics Abbreviated Key Title: Sch J Phys Math Stat ISSN 2393-8056 (Print) | ISSN 2393-8064 (Online) Journal homepage: https://saspublishers.com Improved Estimation of Population Variance Utilizing Known Auxiliary Parameters 1* 1 Shiv Shankar Soni , Himanshu Pandey 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, DDU Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur, Civil Lines, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh 273009, India DOI: 10.36347/sjpms.2022.v09i06.001 | Received: 03.07.2022 | Accepted: 09.08.2022 | Published: 13.08.2022 *Corresponding author: Shiv Shankar Soni Department of Mathematics and Statistics, DDU Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur, Civil Lines, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh 273009, India Abstract Original Research Article Even similar things, whether created artificially or naturally, can vary. We should therefore try to estimate this variation. For improved population variance estimate, we propose a Searls ratio type estimator in the current research employing data on the tri-mean and the third quartile of the auxiliary variable. Up to the first-degree approximation, the suggested estimator's bias and mean squared error (MSE) are determined. The characterising scalar's ideal value is discovered, and given this ideal value, the least MSE is discovered. The mean squared errors of the suggested estimator and the competing estimators are contrasted conceptually and experimentally. Given that it has the lowest MSE of the above competing estimators, the recommended estimator has been shown to be the most effective. Keywords: Population Variance, Estimator, Main and Auxiliary variables, Bias, MSE, PRE. Copyright © 2022 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited. 1. INTRODUCTION crosses through the origin, product type estimators are One of the key indicators of dispersion is utilized to improve population variance estimation. In population variance, which is important for making either scenario, the known auxiliary variable is used in day-to-day business decisions. The variance is obvious conjunction with regression type estimators to improve and occurs naturally. The literature has a very strong population variance estimation of the primary variable. foundation for the accurate estimation of the parameters. It is advantageous for big populations to Using the auxiliary data, Singh and Singh reduce errors since doing so will ultimately result in (2001) proposed a ratio-type estimator for a enhanced time and planning and decision-making cost savings. estimation of the population variance. Later, Singh and Making accurate estimates is essential for timely Singh (2003) provided an improved regression policymaking. The sample variance, which has the approach for estimating population variance in a two- desirable characteristics of a good estimator, is mostly phase sample design. A useful family of chain used to estimate variance. The sample variance of this estimators was also proposed by Jhajj et al., (2005) for approach could be quite considerable, which is one of the elevated estimation of the population variance under its major downsides. Finding an estimator with a the sub-sampling method. Furthermore, Shabbir and sample distribution that is tightly distributed around the Gupta (2007) focused on the development of auxiliary population variance is therefore necessary. As a result, parameter-based variance estimation. Then, Kadilar and the auxiliary data is necessary to achieve this goal. Cingi (2007) proposed various enhancements to the simple random sampling scheme's variance estimation. The auxiliary variable, denoted by X , which Using the understanding of the kurtosis of an auxiliary has a strong association with the study variable, denoted variable in sample surveys, Singh et al., (2008) by Y , provides additional information. When Y and proposed a virtually impartial ratio and product type X have a strong positive correlation and the regression estimator of the finite population variance. A correction line of one passes through the origin, the ratio remark on the improved estimation of population estimators are employed to estimate the enhanced variance using auxiliary parameters was reported by population variance. When Y and X have a strong Grover (2010). Additionally, Singh and Solanki (2012) negative correlation and the regression line of one Citation: Shiv Shankar Soni & Himanshu Pandey. Improved Estimation of Population Variance Utilizing Known Auxiliary Parameters. Sch J Phys Math Stat, 2022 Aug 9(6): 92-101. 92 Shiv Shankar Soni & Himanshu Pandey., Sch J Phys Math Stat, Aug, 2022; 9(6): 92-101 proposed a novel method utilising auxiliary data for The suggested estimators and their sample variance estimate in simple random sampling. characteristics up to the first order approximation are described in Section 3. The efficiency comparison of Yadav and Kadilar (2014), on the other hand, the proposed estimator with the competing estimators suggested a two-parameter increased variance estimator and the requirements for the proposed estimator's using auxiliary parameters. An improved family of superiority over competing estimators are explained in estimators for estimating population variance using Section 4. The empirical research presented in Section 5 auxiliary variable quartiles was proposed by Singh and is the one in which the biases and MSEs for the actual Pal (2016). Yadav et al., (2017) suggested an improved natural population were computed. The conclusions variance estimator using the auxiliary variable's known drawn from the numerical study's findings are discussed tri-mean and interquartile range. Using the well-known in Section 6. The conclusion of the results of the study tri-mean and third quartile of the auxiliary variable, is presented in Section 7 and the paper ends with the Yadav et al., (2019) have proposed an increased references. estimator of the population variance. When outliers were present, Naz et al., (2020) offered ratio-type 2. LITERATURE REVIEW estimators of population variance and employed Let the finite population U is made up of N unconventional dispersion measures of the auxiliary different and recognizable units U ,U ,..........,U variable, which had a high correlation with the primary 1 2 N variable under discussion. Olayiwola et al., (2021) and the ‘Simple Random Sampling Without worked on a new exponential ratio estimator of Replacement’ (SRSWOR) method is used to collect a population variance and shown improvement over many sample of size n units from this population, assuming existing estimators of population variance. Bhushan et that Y and X has a strong correlation between them. Let al., (2022) suggested some new modified classes of (Y , X ) be the observation on the ith unit of the population variance utilizing the known auxiliary i i parameters. population, i 1,2,..., N . Sharma et al., (2022) and Searls (1964) served The most suitable estimator for population as inspiration for this investigation. To improve the variance S2 is the sample variance s2, given by, population variance estimation of the key variable in y y this study, we propose a Searls type estimator and use a 2 1 n 2 t s (y y) known population tri-mean and third quartile. Bias in 0 y n1 i sampling is examined up to an approximation of order i1 one, and mean squared error (MSE) is as well. The remaining portions of the essay have been divided into The variance of t0 for an approximation of degree one sections. Review of population variance estimators for is, the research variable using auxiliary variable V(t ) S4( 1)…………………….. (1) parameters that are known can be found in Section 2. 0 y 40 Where, N n N 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 rs , S (y Y) , y y , Y y , rs , n N y N1 i n i N i r / 2 s / 2 i1 i1 i1 20 02 1 N (Y Y)r(X X)s rs N1 i i i1 Isaki (1983) utilized the known positively correlated auxiliary information and suggested the following usual ratio estimator of S 2 as, y 2 t s2Sx r y s2 x It is a biased estimator and its MSE up to the first order of approximation is, MSE(t ) S4[( 1)( 1)2( 1)]………………. (2) r y 40 04 22 Upadhyaya and Singh (1999) used the known coefficient of kurtosis of X and introduced an estimator of S2 as, y © 2022 Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics | Published by SAS Publishers, India 93 Shiv Shankar Soni & Himanshu Pandey., Sch J Phys Math Stat, Aug, 2022; 9(6): 92-101 2 t s2Sx 2 1 y s2 x 2 The MSE of t for an approximation of order one is, 1 MSE (t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)]……………… (3) 1 y 40 1 04 1 22 Where, S2 1 N R x and S2 (x X)2 1 S2 x N1 i x 2 i1 Kadilar and Cingi (2006) suggested three estimators of S2 utilizing 2, and C as, y Sx 2 x 2 2 2 t s2Sx Cx, t s2Sx2 Cx, t s2SxCx 2 2 y s2 C 3 y s2 C 4 y s2C x x x 2 x x x 2 The MSEs of ti (i 2,3,4) for an approximation of order one is, MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] ……………….. (4) i y 40 i 04 i 22 Where, S2 S2 S2C S R x , R x 2 , R x x and C x 2 S2 C 3 S2 C 4 S2C x X x x x 2 x x x 2 Subramani & Kumarpandiyan (2012a) utilized the known median Md of X and proposed the following estimator of S2as, y 2 t s2Sx Md 5 y s2 M x d The MSE of t5 for an approximation of order one is, MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] ……………… (5) 5 y 40 5 04 5 22 Where, S2 R x 1 S2 M x d Subramani & Kumarpandiyan (2012b) utilized the known quartiles of X and their functions and suggested the following five estimators of S 2 as, y 2 2 2 2 2 2 S Q 2 S Q 2 S Q 2 S Q 2 S Q t s x 1 , t s x 3 , t s x r , t s x d , t s x a 6 y s2 Q 7 y s2 Q 8 y s2 Q 9 y s2 Q 10 y s2 Q x 1 x 3 x r x d x a The MSEs of ti (i 6,7,...,10) for an approximation of order one is, MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] …………………. (6) i y 40 i 04 i 22 © 2022 Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics | Published by SAS Publishers, India 94 Shiv Shankar Soni & Himanshu Pandey., Sch J Phys Math Stat, Aug, 2022; 9(6): 92-101 Where, S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 R x , R x , R x , R x , R x and Q Q Q , 6 S2 Q 7 S2 Q 8 S2 Q 9 S2 Q 10 S2 Q r 3 1 x 1 x 3 x r x d x a Q Q Q Q Q 3 1 , Q 3 1 . d 2 a 2 Subramani & Kumarpandiyan (2013) suggested a new estimator of S2 using known S2, M and C as, y x d x 2 t s2SxCx Md 11 y s2C M x x d The MSE of t5 for an approximation of order one is, MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] ……………… (7) 11 y 40 11 04 11 22 Where, S2C R x x 11 S2C M x x d Khan & Shabbir (2013) utilized the known third quartile Q3of X and correlation coefficient between Y and X and suggested an estimator of S2 as, y 2 2 S Q t s x 3 12 y s2 Q x 3 The MSE of t for an approximation of order one is, 12 MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2 ( 1)2R ( 1)] …………………. (8) 12 y 40 12 04 12 22 Where, S2 R x 12 S2Q x 3 Maqbool and Javaid (2017) utilized known S2, TM and Q of X and suggested the following estimator of S2 as, x a y 2 2 S (TM Q ) t s x a 13 y s2 (TM Q ) x a The MSE of t13for an approximation of order one is, MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] ……………… (9) 13 y 40 13 04 13 22 Where, S2 Q 2Q Q R x and TM 1 2 3 13 S2 (TM Q ) 4 x a Khalil et al., (2018) suggested the following three estimators of S2 using the known auxiliary parameters as, y 2 2 2 t s2Sx CxSx, t s2Sx CxX , t s2Sx CxMd 14 y s2 C S 15 y s2 C X 16 y s2 C M x x x x x x x d © 2022 Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics | Published by SAS Publishers, India 95
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.