151x Filetype PDF File size 0.24 MB Source: policies.education.nsw.gov.au
OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES On Education in the 21st Century RICHARD WATSON | LECTURER AND FUTURIST An essay commissioned by the NSW Department of Education ON EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY ABOUT THE AUTHOR Richard Watson is the author of Digital Vs. Human (Scribe, Melbourne, 2016). He was born in England, but has lived in Australia and has children brought up under both systems. EDUCATION: FUTURE FRONTIERS is an initiative of the NSW Department of Education exploring the implications of developments in AI and automation for education. As part of the Education: Future Frontiers Occasional Paper series, the Department has commissioned essays by distinguished authors to stimulate debate and discussion about AI, education and 21st century skill needs. The views expressed in these essays are solely those of the authors. Education: Future Frontiers | Occasional Paper Series 2 ON EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY here’s a scene in the classic Woody Allen THE ONLY THING WE CAN Tmovie Annie Hall where the nine-year-old SAY WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY Alvy Singer has been taken to see his doctor ABOUT THE FUTURE IS because he’s become depressed. His mother, who is at her wits end, points out it’s because of something THAT IT’S UNCERTAIN. IT IS Alvy has read in a book. Alvy explains the problem: THEREFORE SURELY OUR “The universe is expanding, someday it will break RESPONSIBILITY... TO ENSURE apart and that would be the end of everything.” THAT OUR CHILDREN HAVE “He’s stopped doing his homework” his mother adds, to which Alvy responds: “What’s the point?” A DECENT FUTURE. This is a more imaginative version of the dog ate my homework excuse and while it’s a little early to be getting We’ve been here before many times, of course. Machines metaphysical one might expand Alvy’s point about there have a long and rather repetitive history of stamping out being no point to enquire about the purpose of education human skills and while it may be true that the scale and in an age of information on-demand, kindergarten robots the speed of change are different this time, they might and artificial intelligence. not be. In an era dominated by the internet, mobile devices and We would therefore do well to remember the sage screens why would one need to physically attend school? piece of advice contained in Douglas Adam’s book, The Surely everything you need to learn can be accessed from Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, which is “Don’t Panic!” home? Moreover, why bother with spelling, arithmetic We repeatedly overestimate the impact of new inventions or even languages if Google can do all this for you? In over the shorter term and while many superficial things fact why bother learning anything at all if you can access are changing, many deeper things are not. everything from anywhere at any time? What’s the point? FAST FORWARD TO THE FUTURE On the other hand, the only thing we can say with absolute certainty about the distant future is that it’s I am aware of university students refusing to attend uncertain. It is therefore surely our responsibility as adults lectures, because they prefer to download their lectures and educators of future generations to ensure that our and watch them at their own convenience at 1.5 children have a decent future. We should therefore make times speed, rewinding anything that isn’t instantly mild preparations for a number of different outcomes, clear or understandable. But what’s the point of even especially any that currently appear unfavourable. this if advanced machine learning and autonomous After all, if just about everything else is being digitally systems are capable of doing almost everything humans disrupted why not education? Surely education is one of can do at a fraction of the cost? Under the current the last bastions of the analogue and unless educators system are we not teaching the next generation start to think about how to maximise the upsides of to become rapidly redundant in the face of accelerating digital technologies they will rapidly fall victim to the technological change? digital downsides. Education: Future Frontiers | Occasional Paper Series 3 ON EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY I’M A LITTLE RETICENT TO THE LEANING TOWER OF PISA SUGGEST THAT EDUCATION Every time a freshly caffeine infused official is put behind NEEDS TO BE REINVENTED, a desk there seem to be panicked cries to move forward PARTLY BECAUSE MANY (or sometimes backwards) to compete with countries ASPECTS OF THE SYSTEM towards the top the PISA global education rankings, namely: a) Singapore b) China, c) South Korea or d) WORK PERFECTLY WELL. Finland. This is a little odd because a) while Singapore is good The educational system that exists in Australia today at memorisation it has an issue with creative problem is one largely shipped over from England in the 19th solving, b) so does China c) ditto South Korea, which by Century when the economy was based upon agriculture, the way has a mental health epidemic largely caused by repetitive work and skills that generally resulted in jobs the pressure of a somewhat binary examination system. d) for life. These jobs weren’t necessarily interesting, but Finland, was a late developer educationally speaking, so they did involve physical activity and provided identity and it’s fairly easy to dazzle from a distance and demonstrate meaning alongside money. This system worked fairly well high gains from a relatively low base. back then, especially when most workers didn’t have to think for themselves. Finland also unintentionally games the PISA system by doing well across a narrow band of conventionally But the system arguably works less well now when academic subjects. If you measure student happiness individuals are increasingly paid for their ideas or their in Finland, for instance, the country is at the bottom of ability to manage or motivate others. The system the class. Youth suicide is high in Finland (as worryingly nowadays is also one where individuals are increasingly elsewhere) and economically the country is one of the responsible for the creation of their own lifetime weakest in Europe. employment. Thus an appreciation of how one sells oneself in an entrepreneurial context might be useful. PISA, like its namesake tower, looks distinctly wobbly. I’m a little reticent to suggest that education needs to be The OECD claims that PISA tests assess whether students reinvented, partly because many aspects of the system have acquired key knowledge and skills that are “essential work perfectly well, and also because one of the big for full participation in modern societies.” They would problems that education suffers from are endless attempts say this because it’s the OECD, but the tests have little to reinvent it. You’d think that after one hundred and or no regard to cultural or regional context and, more fifty years or more we might have learned how to teach, importantly, do not assess how individuals perform or but apparently not. feel about themselves across the whole of their lives. Education: Future Frontiers | Occasional Paper Series 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.