jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Acp 10 4625 2010


 163x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.53 MB       Source: acp.copernicus.org


File: Acp 10 4625 2010
atmos chem phys 10 4625 4641 2010 atmospheric www atmos chem phys net 10 4625 2010 chemistry doi 10 5194 acp 10 4625 2010 author s 2010 cc attribution 3 ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 02 Oct 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
            Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641, 2010                                                             Atmospheric
            www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/4625/2010/                                                                   Chemistry
            doi:10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010
            ©Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License.                                                         andPhysics
            Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric
            datasets from Aerosol Mass Spectrometry
                     1                     1           2,*               3,4        2               3,4           1,5
            N. L. Ng , M. R. Canagaratna , Q. Zhang       , J. L. Jimenez  , J. Tian , I. M. Ulbrich  , J. H. Kroll  ,
                           3,4               6              3,7               7               6                 8                 8
            K.S.Docherty ,P.S.Chhabra ,R.Bahreini ,S.M.Murphy ,J.H.Seinfeld ,L.Hildebrandt ,N.M.Donahue ,
                          3,9,10           10            ´ ˆ 10           11           11                     1
            P. F. DeCarlo     , V. A. Lanz , A. S. H. Prevot , E. Dinar , Y. Rudich , and D. R. Worsnop
            1Aerodyne Research, Inc. Billerica, MA, USA
            2Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
            3CIRES,University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
            4Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
            5Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
            6Department of Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
            7NOAA,EarthSystemResearchLaboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
            8Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
            9Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
            10Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
            11Department of Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
            *nowat: Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
            Received: 27 November 2009 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 23 December 2009
            Revised: 14 April 2010 – Accepted: 29 April 2010 – Published: 20 May 2010
            Abstract. In this study we compile and present results from     ponent mass spectrum) and lower f      (ratio of m/z 43 to
                                                                                                                43
            the factor analysis of 43 Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS)       total signal in the component mass spectrum) than SV-OOA.
            datasets (27 of the datasets are reanalyzed in this work).      A wide range of f     and O:C ratios are observed for both
                                                                                               44
            The components from all sites, when taken together, pro-        LV-OOA(0.17±0.04,0.73±0.14)andSV-OOA(0.07±0.04,
            vide a holistic overview of Northern Hemisphere organic         0.35±0.14) components, reflecting the fact that there is a
            aerosol (OA) and its evolution in the atmosphere. At most       continuum of OOA properties in ambient aerosol. The OOA
            sites, the OA can be separated into oxygenated OA (OOA),        components (OOA, LV-OOA, and SV-OOA) from all sites
            hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA), and sometimes other compo-           cluster within a well-defined triangular region in the f vs.
                                                                                                                                  44
            nents such as biomass burning OA (BBOA). We focus on            f   space, which can be used as a standardized means for
                                                                             43
            the OOA components in this work. In many analyses, the          comparing and characterizing any OOA components (labo-
            OOA can be further deconvolved into low-volatility OOA          ratory or ambient) observed with the AMS. Examination of
            (LV-OOA) and semi-volatile OOA (SV-OOA). Differences            the OOA components in this triangular space indicates that
            in the mass spectra of these components are characterized       OOAcomponentspectrabecomeincreasinglysimilartoeach
                                                        +
            in terms of the two main ions m/z 44 (CO ) and m/z 43           other and to fulvic acid and HULIS sample spectra as f   (a
                                                        2                                                                         44
            (mostly C H O+), which are used to develop a new mass           surrogate for O:C and an indicator of photochemical aging)
                      2  3
            spectral diagnostic for following the aging of OA compo-        increases. This indicates that ambient OA converges towards
            nents in the atmosphere. The LV-OOA component spectra           highly aged LV-OOA with atmospheric oxidation. The com-
            have higher f   (ratio of m/z 44 to total signal in the com-    mon features of the transformation between SV-OOA and
                          44
                                                                            LV-OOAatmultiple sites potentially enable a simplified de-
                                Correspondence to: M. R. Canagaratna        scription of the oxidation of OA in the atmosphere. Com-
                                (mrcana@aerodyne.com)                       parison of laboratory SOA data with ambient OOA indicates
            Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.
            4626                                            N. L. Ng et al.: Organic aerosol components in Northern Hemispheric datasets
            that laboratory SOA are more similar to SV-OOA and rarely         mitz et al., 2008; Ulbrich et al., 2009). In those studies the
            become as oxidized as ambient LV-OOA, likely due to the           OOA-1representedthemoreoxidized,agedaerosolsandthe
            higher loadings employed in the experiments and/or limited        OOA-2 represented the less oxidized, fresher secondary or-
            oxidant exposure in most chamber experiments.                     ganic species. Temporal correlations with sulfate and nitrate
                                                                              (Lanz et al., 2007; Ulbrich et al., 2009) as well as direct
                                                                              volatility measurements (Huffman et al., 2009) in those stud-
            1   Introduction                                                  ies further showed that OOA-1 is less volatile than OOA-2.
                                                                              Since the OOA-1 and OOA-2 terminology does not convey
            Organic aerosols (OA) constitute a substantial fraction (20-      the knownphysiochemicalpropertiesoftheseOOAsubcom-
            90%) of submicron aerosols worldwide and a full under-            ponents, in the following discussion we will refer to these
            standing of their sources, atmospheric processing, and prop-      subcomponents as low-volatility OOA (LV-OOA) and semi-
            erties is important to assess their impacts on climate, human     volatile OOA (SV-OOA),respectively. It is important to note
            health, and visibility (Kanakidou et al., 2005; Zhang et al.,     that the assignment of LV-OOA and SV-OOA to the compo-
            2007; Kroll and Seinfeld, 2008; Hallquist et al., 2009). The      nents identified at each site is not absolute, meaning that the
            Aerodyne AMS provides quantitative data on inorganic and          LV-OOAatonesitedoesnothavethesamecompositionasin
            organic aerosol species in submicron non-refractory aerosol       another site. This is an expected result since factor analysis
            particles with high-time resolution. In recent years, several     has been applied separately to each site. Thus here the ter-
            techniqueshavebeenemployedtodeconvolvethemassspec-                minology for the OOA subtypes is relative for each site (i.e.,
                                                                              at each site the component with a higher f      is referred to
            tra of the organic aerosols acquired with the AMS includ-                                                      44
                                                                              as LV-OOA and the component with a lower f         is referred
            ing custom principal component analysis (CPCA) (Zhang                                                             44
                                                                              to as SV-OOA regardless of the absolute values of f ). An
            et al., 2005a), multiple component analysis (MCA) (Zhang                                                                44
            et al., 2007), hierarchical cluster analysis (Marcolli et al.,    absolute volatility scale for LV-OOA and SV-OOA is being
            2006), positive matrix factorization (PMF) (Paatero and Tap-      investigated (e.g. Faulhaber et al., 2009; Cappa et al., 2009)
            per, 1994; Paatero 1997; Lanz et al., 2007; Nemitz et al.,        but requires a better understanding of the volatility measure-
            2008; Aiken et al., 2008; Aiken et al., 2009b; Ulbrich et al.,    ments of ambient aerosols (e.g., with thermodenuders).
            2009),andtheMultilinearEngine(ME-2)(Lanzetal.,2008).                 ThegoalofthisstudyistocompareandcontrasttheOOA
                                                                              components identified in multiple field studies in order to
               Multivariate analysis by Zhang et al. (2007) showed            better characterize the sources and evolution of OA in the at-
            that OA at multiple sites can be described by two main            mosphere. We present results from the factor analysis of 43
            components: hydrocarbon-like organic aerosol (HOA) and            AMSdatasets. 27 of the datasets, which encompass a major-
            oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA). Biomass burning OA              ity of the sites in Zhang et al. (2007), are reanalyzed as part of
            (BBOA)andother local primary sources have also been ob-           this work. We focus mainly on the OOA component and the
            served (Jimenez et al., 2009). OOA accounts for a large frac-     reanalysis allows for further deconvolution of the total OOA
            tion (72±21%) of the total organic mass at many locations         componentreportedbyZhangetal.(2007)intoLV-OOAand
            (Zhang et al., 2007; Jimenez et al., 2009). Studies from mul-     SV-OOA components. The OA components resulting from
            tiple locations show that the HOA component correlates well       this work were used by Jimenez et al. (2009) to form the ba-
            with primary tracers such as CO and NOx (e.g. Zhang et al.,       sis of a modeling framework that links oxidation and volatil-
            2005b; Lanz et al., 2007; Aiken et al., 2009b; Ulbrich et         ity to capture the evolution of OA in the atmosphere. In this
            al., 2009) and can be considered as a surrogate of combus-        manuscript we combine the factor analysis results from the
            tion primary OA (POA). BBOA correlates with acetonitrile,         ambientdatasetstogethertoobtainaholisticviewofhowthe
            levoglucosan, and potassium, and can be considered a surro-       AMSambient component mass spectra change across envi-
            gate of BB POA (Aiken et al., 2009a, b). The OOA compo-           ronments with different sources and aerosol processes. The
            nent has been shown to be a good surrogate of secondary OA        common features of the component spectra are used to de-
            (SOA) in multiple studies, correlating well with secondary        velop a new mass spectral diagnostic for following the atmo-
            species such as O and Ox (de Gouw et al., 2005; Zhang et          spheric aging of OA components in the atmosphere. Finally,
                              3
            al., 2005a, b, 2007; Volkamer et al., 2006; Lanz et al., 2007;    since the AMS has been employed in many laboratory ex-
            Herndon et al., 2008).                                            periments over the years, a series of chamber data (both pub-
               In many analyses, two types of OOA have been identi-           lished and unpublished) are also integrated and compared to
            fied. The two broad subtypes differ in volatility and degree       the ambient data. Chamber data provide the basis for sim-
            of oxidation (Jimenez et al., 2009), as indicated by the ratio    ulating SOA formation in the atmosphere. Hence, it is im-
            of m/z 44 to total signal in the component mass spectrum          portant to evaluate whether the results from chamber exper-
            (f ). The more oxidized component (higher f ) has pre-            iments are representative of the atmosphere; similarities and
              44                                             44
            viously been referred to as OOA-1 while the less oxidized         differences between ambient OOA and laboratory SOA are
            component (lower f ) has previously been referred to as           examined and discussed.
                                  44
            OOA-2 (Lanz et al., 2007; Aiken et al., 2008, 2009b; Ne-
            Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641, 2010                                              www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/4625/2010/
             N. L. Ng et al.: Organic aerosol components in Northern Hemispheric datasets                                                 4627
             2   Method                                                          analysis. The analysis and input error calculations are per-
                                                                                 formed following the procedures described by Ulbrich et
             The organic aerosol data have been obtained with the Aero-          al. (2009). The optimal number of PMF components is de-
             dyne quadrupole mass aerosol spectrometer (Q-AMS), the              termined by carefully examining the scaled residuals, evalu-
             compact time-of-flight mass spectrometer (C-ToF-AMS), or             ating the component’s diurnal cycles and factor correlations
             the high-resolution ToF-AMS (HR-ToF-AMS). The instru-               with external tracers (including CO, O3, NOx, NOy, SO2,
             ment design and operation of each version of the AMS has                −          2−
                                                                                 NO , and SO , when available), and comparing the com-
             been described in detail by Jayne et al. (2000), Drewnick               3          4
             et al. (2005), and DeCarlo et al. (2006), respectively, and         ponent spectra with source mass spectra from the AMS mass
             reviewed by Canagaratna et al. (2007). Factor analyses of           spectra database (Ulbrich et al., 2009). The PMF2 optimiza-
             the data from Riverside, CA, Whistler (Canada), and Mex-            tion algorithm starts from random initial conditions, which
             ico City (both ground and aircraft data) are based on high          can be changed by varying the value of the SEED input pa-
             resolution (HR) data from HR-ToF-AMS, while analyses for            rameter. Multiple solutions generated with different SEED
             all other locations are based on unit mass resolution (UMR)         values are carefully examined to explore the possibility of
             data.  The details (locations, times, previous publications,        multiple local minima in the solutions. The uncertainty in
             etc.) of all datasets included in this study are given in the       component mass spectra and time series due to rotation am-
             supplementary material.                                             biguity is also examined by performing PMF analysis over
               In this work we present factor analysis results from 43           a range of FPEAK values. Overall, the effect of positive
             AMS datasets. As part of this work, we performed PMF                FPEAKistocreate more near-zero values in the mass spec-
             (Paatero and Tapper, 1994; Paatero, 1997) based factor anal-        tra and decrease the number of near-zero values in the time
             ysis of the organic aerosol mass spectra observed at 27 of the      series; negative FPEAK values have the opposite effect (Ul-
             sites. For some of the urban downwind/rural/remote sites, a         brich et al., 2009). For all sites, improved correlations with
             hybrid of PMF/MCA approach is employed (Cottrell et al.,            external tracers or mass spectra are not found for FPEAK
             2008; Nemitz et al., 2008). The factor analyses of the re-          valuesdifferent from 0. Thus the FPEAK=0solutions, which
             maining 16 sites were performed previously and the results          bound the observed data most closely, are chosen for all the
             are discussed in more detail in the corresponding publica-          sites analyzed in this study.
             tions: Beijing (Sun et al., 2009), Riverside (Docherty et al.,         Rotational ambiguity can be explored by examining the
             2008;Huffmanetal.,2009),MexicoCity(Aikenetal.,2008,                 appearance and disappearance of zero values in the mass
             2009a, b; DeCarlo et al., 2009), Pittsburgh (Zhang et al.,          spectra and time series of the factors (Paatero, 2008). In
             2005a, b; Ulbrich et al., 2009), Thompson Farm, NH (Cot-            typical ambient datasets, a priori information about compo-
             trell et al., 2008), Zurich (Lanz et al., 2007), Egbert (Slowik     nent time points or fragment ions with true zero values is
             et al., 2010), Crete (Hildebrandt et al., 2010), and the great      not known; thus, the appearance of unrealistic zero values
             Alpine region (Lanz et al., 2009). For the sites in Lanz et         in the mass spectra and time series of the solutions can be
             al. (2009), both PMF and ME-2 are used. In contrast to PMF,         used to evaluate the most reasonable limits of the FPEAK
             ME-2 allows for a priori constraints (partial or total) on the      parameter (Ulbrich et al., 2009). For a few sites where com-
             massspectra and/or time series of the factors (Paatero, 1999;       ponent mass spectra or time series are highly correlated, ro-
             Lanz et al., 2008).                                                 tational ambiguity is more significant. The change in mass
               PMFisamultivariate factor analysis technique developed            spectra with FPEAK is more dramatic in components with
             by Paatero and Tapper (1994) and Paatero (1997) to solve            a smaller mass fraction, as they can change more without
             the bilinear factor model x   =6 g f +e wherex are                  causing large changes in the residuals. For instance, in the
                                        ij     p ip pj      ij        ij         Pittsburgh dataset (acquired in September 2002) studied by
             the measured values of j species in i samples, P are factors        Ulbrich et al. (2009), the variation in f      and f     in the
             comprised of constant source profiles (f , mass spectra for                                                      44        43
                                                        j                        SV-OOA component across the range of retained solutions
             AMSdata) with varying contributions over the time period            (FPEAK −1.6 to 1.0) was ∼30%, for the LV-OOA compo-
             of the dataset (g , time series), without any a priori assump-
                              i                                                  nent ∼2%,andfortheHOAcomponent∼5%(relativetothe
             tions of either mass spectral or time profile (Lanz et al., 2007;    solution with FPEAK=0). In general, it is found that the
             Ulbrich et al., 2009). PMF computes the solution by min-            component mass spectra and time series for most sites ana-
             imizing the summed least squares errors of the fit weighted          lyzed in this work do not vary drastically over the reasonable
             withtheerrorestimatesofeachdatapoint. Solutionsarealso              rangeofFPEAKchosen. Forexample,therelativeuncertain-
             constrained to have non-negative values. The error weight-          ties in OOA component mass spectra for f        and f    (these
             ing and non-negativity constraint result in more physically                                                      44       43
             meaningful solutions that are easier to interpret compared to       fragments will be discussed in detail in the following sec-
             other receptor models.                                              tions) are typically <5%. For the Lanz et al. (2009) sites,
                                                                                 similar rotational uncertainties are observed except for sites
               The PMF2 executable version 4.2 in the robust mode                with low f     in SV-OOA, where an absolute uncertainty of
             (Paatero, 1997) is used together with a custom software tool                    44
             (PMF Evaluation Tool (PET), Ulbrich et al., 2009) in this           ±5%isestimated.
             www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/4625/2010/                                                 Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641, 2010
                   4628                                                                      N. L. Ng et al.: Organic aerosol components in Northern Hemispheric datasets
    1     Fig. 1.                                                                                                 28     Fig. 2. 
                                                                                             44                                                                  O:C atomic ratio
                       l0.12                 43         HOA           l0.12                            OOA
                       a                                              a                                                         14
                       n                      55                      n
                        0.10                                          g0.10
                       g                                              i                 43                                                  0.2           0.4          0.6           0.8           1.0           1.2
                       i                                              s
                       s                          57                   
                                         41                           l
                       l                                              a0.08                                                     12
                       a0.08                                          t
                       t                                              o                                                       s
                       o                                              t
                       t                                               
                                                                      f0.06                                                   e
                       f0.06                                          o                                                       t
                       o                                                                                                      i 10
                                                                      n                                                       s
                       n                                              o                                                        
                       o0.04                                          i0.04                                                                                                                               HOA
                       i                                              t                                                       f
                       t                                              c                                                       o
                       c                                              a                                                          8                                                                        OOA
                       a                                              r
                       r0.02                                          f0.02                                                   r
                       f                                                                                                      e
                        0.00                                           0.00                                                   b  6
                             0     20     40m/z60      80    100            0     20     40 m/z 60     80    100              m
                                                                                                                              u  4
                                                                                                                              N
                                              44                    80x10-3                                                      2
                       l0.12                          LV-OOA         l                  43  44       SV-OOA
                       a                                             a                                                           0
                       n0.10                                         n
                       g                                             g  60
                       i                  43                         i
                       s                                             s
                                                                      
                       l                                             l                                                             0.00         0.05         0.10         0.15         0.20         0.25         0.30
                       a0.08                                         a
                       t                                             t
                       o                                             o
                       t                                             t
                                                                        40
                       f0.06                                         f                                                                                                    f
                       o                                             o                                                                                                      44
                                                                      
                       n                                             n                                                          20
                       o0.04                                         o
                       i                                             i
                       t                                             t  20
                       c                                             c                                                                                                                                   LV-OOA
                       a                                             a
                       r0.02                                         r
                       f                                             f                                                        s                                                                          SV-OOA
                        0.00                                              0                                                   e
                                                                                                                              t
                                                                                                                              i 15
                             0     20     40    60     80    100            0     20     40m/z 60      80    100              s
                                             m/z                                                                               
    2                                                                                                                         f
                                                                                                                              o
    3                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                              r
    4                                                                                                                         e 10
    5              Fig. 1. Example mass spectra of the HOA, total OOA, LV-OOAand                                              b
                                                                                                                              m
    6              SV-OOAcomponentsidentifiedfromthePittsburghdataset (Zhang                                                   u
    7              et al., 2007; Ulbrich et al., 2009). Note that the total OOA spectrum                                      N  5
    8              is not the average of the LV-OOA and SV-OOA because LV-OOA
    9              accounts for a much larger fraction (59%) of OA than SV-OOA                                                   0
   10              (10%) in Pittsburgh.                                                                                            0.00         0.05         0.10         0.15         0.20         0.25         0.30
   11      
   12                                                                                                             29                                                       f44                                               
   13                                                                                                             30      
   14              3     Results and discussion                                                                   31      
   15                                                                                                                     Fig. 2. Histograms showing the distribution of f                           and estimated
   16                                                                                                             32                                                                             44
                                                                                                                  33      
   17                                                                                                                     O:Catomicratios observed across the multiple sites. The top panel
                   3.1      Overviewoforganicaerosol components in the                                            34      
   18                                                                                                                     corresponds to sites where only one OOA component is obtained.
                            Northern Hemisphere                                                                   35      
   19                                                                                                                     ThebottompanelcorrespondstositeswherebothLV-OOAandSV-
                                                                                                                  36      
   20                                                                                                             37      
                                                                                                                          OOAareresolved.
   21              Figure 1 shows example mass spectra of the HOA, total38   
   22                                                                                                             39      
   23              OOA, LV-OOA, and SV-OOA components identified from40   
   24                                                                                                             41      
   25              the Pittsburgh dataset (Zhang et al., 2005b; Ulbrich et al.,                                           end of the SV-OOA range and the low end of the LV-OOA
   26              2009). The HOA component is distinguished by the clear                                                 range occurs because the names SV-OOA and LV-OOA are
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          2 
   27              hydrocarbonsignaturesinits spectrum, which are dominated                                               relative for each site. Since an absolute scale to define volatil-
                                                       +                      +                                           ity is not available, it is likely that the volatilities of the SV-
                   by the ion series C H                       and C H                 (m/z 27, 29, 41,
                                                  n 2n+1                 n 2n−1
                   43, 55, 57, 69, 71, 83, 85, 97, 99...) that are typical of hy-1                                        OOAandLV-OOAcomponentsintheoverlappingregionare
                   drocarbons. The (total) OOA component is distinguished by                                              not very different from each other.
                                                              +
                   the prominent m/z 44 (CO ) in its spectrum and the lower                                                   The different f              and O:C values observed for the OOA
                                                              2                                                                                       44
                   relative intensity of higher mass fragments. Figure 2 shows                                            components in Fig. 2 reflect the fact that there is a contin-
                   the distribution of f                for the HOA, total OOA, LV-OOA,                                   uumofOOApropertiesinambientaerosol. At each site this
                                                    44
                   andSV-OOAcomponentsobservedacrossthemultiplesites.                                                     continuum is discretized into SV-OOA and LV-OOA com-
                   The top axis shows O:C ratios estimated using the f                                         of         ponents according to the details of the ambient OOA that is
                                                                                                          44
                   the PMF-resolved factor mass spectra and the correlation de-                                           observed at that particular site. Figure 3 explicitly shows the
                   rived by Aiken et al. (2008). As seen in Fig. 2, both average                                          O:C atomic ratios and f                     of the OOA, LV-OOA, and SV-
                                                                                                                                                                 44
                   f      and O:C for HOA components are generally very low.                                              OOAcomponentsateachsite. SimilartoZhangetal.(2007),
                     44
                   The OOA components, on the other hand, have higher f                                                   the sites have been grouped according to their location as ei-
                                                                                                               44
                   and O:C values of 0.14±0.04 and 0.62±0.15. The f                                         and           ther being primarily urban or urban downwind/rural/remote.
                                                                                                        44
                   O:CratiosforalltheLV-OOAandSV-OOAfallintotwodis-                                                       For some sites only one OOA factor is obtained while for
                   tinctive groups. The average f                      and O:C ratio for SV-OOA                           others the range of oxidation is represented by both LV-
                                                                   44
                   components are 0.07±0.04 and 0.35±0.14, while those for                                                OOAand SV-OOA components. For sites where both LV-
                   the LV-OOA components are 0.17±0.04 and 0.73±0.14. It                                                  OOAandSV-OOAareresolved, the average OOA O:C ob-
                   is important to note that a wide range of f                             and O:C is ob-                 served at any given time point can be reconstructed as a
                                                                                      44
                   served around the average values for both the LV-OOA and                                               mass-weightedaverageoftheLV-OOAandSV-OOAO:C.In
                   SV-OOA components across all sites. This underscores the                                               Fig. 3, the mass-weighted average OOA component over the
                   fact that neither the total OOA nor OOA subtypes are identi-                                           entire campaignisalsoshownforsitesinwhichLV-OOAand
                   cal across the different sites. Some overlap between the high                                          SV-OOA are both resolved. The sites within each location
                   Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641, 2010                                                                                            www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/4625/2010/
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Atmos chem phys atmospheric www net chemistry doi acp author s cc attribution license andphysics organic aerosol components observed in northern hemispheric datasets from mass spectrometry n l ng m r canagaratna q zhang j jimenez tian i ulbrich h kroll k docherty p chhabra bahreini murphy seinfeld hildebrandt donahue f decarlo v a lanz prevot e dinar y rudich and d worsnop aerodyne research inc billerica ma usa sciences center state university of new york albany ny cires colorado boulder co department biochemistry civil environmental engineering massachusetts institute technology cambridge chemical california pasadena ca noaa earthsystemresearchlaboratory for particle studies carnegie mellon pittsburgh pa oceanic science laboratory paul scherrer institut villigen switzerland weizmann rehovot israel nowat toxicology davis received november published discuss december revised april accepted may abstract this study we compile present results ponent spectrum lower ratio z to the factor anal...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.