135x Filetype PDF File size 0.51 MB Source: www.kansas4-h.org
Extension Education Theoretical Framework With Criterion-Referenced Assessment Tools Extension Manual EM-02-2013 Introduction A guiding principle of Extension is that our 3. Provide common ground for both educational programming is based on the individuals and teams from multiple use on knowledge generated through disciplines in varying positions who will research-based, scientific inquiry. To design, test and evaluate educational produce individual, family, business or programs and materials. community change, use of the science of Use of Theory change educators need to use the science of change and of h and adult and Theory is important. It provides uniformity organizational development and and “becomes a predictor of facts” and empowerment. Additional bodies of “stimulates and guides scientific inquiry and knowledge are needed so that science is analyzes and explains its findings” (Boone, infused in content and process. Safrit, & Jones, 2002, p. 65). Application of While adult and youth education program theories has many benefits: planning frameworks exist, Extension does 1. Increases the likelihood that intended not have a unified theory that incorporates outcomes will be achieved; multiple disciplines and provides 2. Provides the rationale for how the assessments tools to study the program is strategically structured and effectiveness of materials and educational delivered; delivery. This manual was created specifically to 3. Offers the basis for assessment of the enable Extension educators to incorporate program’s degree of success in a theoretical framework in program design. achieving intended outcomes. The manual can: 4. Enables program planners to combine their experience and insight with 1. Stimulate thought and dialogue that will evidence-based explanations of further enrich the use of the framework; behavior change; 2. Guide educators and specialists who will 5. Contains key concepts and variables design, test and evaluate Extension that define how the concepts will be educational programming; and measured for evaluation of a theory- driven program; For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu 1 6. Provides a rationale for what Testing Theories for “Goodness of Fit” educational program designers do or “A useful theory makes assumptions about did, and with what result. a behavior … problem, target population or Finally, while theories inform practice, environment that are: practice can also inform theory. When • Logical; defensible assessments are done, • Consistent with everyday Extension’s programs can inform and observations; build new theory. • Similar to those used in previous Theories for Extension Education successful programs; and • Supported by past research in the same or related area” (1, p. 5) As educational program planners, we need theory to understand how to increase the likelihood that desired outcomes will be Applying Theories to Educational achieved. Often, no one theory is adequate Programs to guide the creation, delivery and measurement of educational programs. After analyzing theories for goodness of fit, Selection of theories depends on an Extension educational program planners assessment of the situation, identification of can use guidelines for designing the targeted population, an understanding information dissemination and educational of the behavior to be addressed or change programming focused on change-making. to be made and determination of outcomes These guidelines can be used for multiple that are strategic, measurable, achievable, media in both group and individual learning. relevant and timely. Finally, the level of A set of guidelines is shown in Table 2. program—individual, family or other group, Assessing New and Existing Programs, community or policy—will guide the Curricula and Materials appropriate programming theories. Criterion-referenced assessment tools can For this guide, we are focused on theories be used for assessing both existing that involve people and behavior (rather educational programs, curricula and than communities or policies) and have materials and for developing new ones. chosen the following individually-focused In this guide, we provide three individual but theories: complementary tools for assessing existing social cognitive theory, educational programs, curriculum and stages of change or readiness, educational materials and those under theory of planned behavior, development. Criterion-referenced communications, assessment tools permit multiple individuals adult or youth development, to make judgments using common criteria empowerment, and with common definitions. All three tools are evaluation and action research. located in the Appendices. Each is briefly presented in Table 1. Other theories could be analyzed and presented using the model as an example. For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu 2 Other Theories in Program Development, Delivery and Evaluation This guide is intended to stimulate thought and dialogue and to help youth and adult education program developers. It can be used in program development, at the end of pilot testing a program, and during a full-scale program implementation stage. We understand that continuous improvement may require that this guide be modified as others test our ideas and theories. Theoretical Frameworks Table 1 consists of a set of eight theories chosen by the authors based on their research and practice at the local, state, and national levels with educational programs designed to produce behavioral change. These eight theories are a base from which to start: Other theories could be added and used. Each theory is presented with a list of authors, a description, suggestions for application, comments by the developers, and questions for users. Complete citations are found in the references section. For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu 3 Table 1: Individual Level Theories Overview and Use Theory Name Description Application Comments Questions Social Self-efficacy is the Build confidence Ties to theory of How do we determine Cognitive “do-ability” factor— and sense of planned behavior the self-efficacy of our Theory the measure of the control based on and stages of targeted learners? Bandura (5) ability to take the where the change or desired action. consumer is at readiness. How can we build the start of confidence, Do-ability is affected program competence and by perception of control into our control. If a behavior is educational design? complex, smaller, Control includes easier tasks Are there complex sufficient competence should be used to tasks that must be and confidence to create small done to act on the act. successes. tasks? Self-confidence is Progress should How can we divide key to taking action. be recognized, complex tasks into rewarded and subtasks? reinforced as tasks or subtasks What kinds of are completed. recognition, rewards and reinforcement can we build into the design? Should we include measures of self- efficacy in our baseline and outcomes assessment? How can we tie our self-efficacy components to stages of readiness? For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.