Filetype PDF | Posted on 01 Oct 2022 | 3 years ago
Authentication
digital resources
177x Filetype PDF File size 0.65 MB Source: www.atlantis-press.com
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 633
International Conference on Madrasah Reform 2021 (ICMR 2021)
Five-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Test
Development: Empirical Evidences to Improve
Students’ Science Literacy
1,* 2 3 4
Anasufi Banawi Wahyu Sopandi Asep Kadarohman Muhammad Solehuddin
1 Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education Study Program, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon, Ambon, Indonesia
2 Elementary Education Study Program & Chemistry Education Study Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung, Indonesia
3 Chemistry Study Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
4 Elementary Education Study Program & Guidance and Counseling Education Study Program, Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
*Corresponding author. Email: anasufibanawi@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
This study aims to develop the five-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test to identify prospective elementary school
teachers’ misconceptions about phase transition using descriptive and verification methods. The subjects include 149
(116 female and 33 male students) prospective elementary school teachers in one of the Elementary School Teacher
Education Study Programs (ESTESP) in West Java. The stages of the study are as follows: (1) designing a five-tier test
instrument to analyze students’ misconceptions; (2) validation by experts; (3) instrument testing that was done on
prospective teachers who have received phase transition materials; and (4) instrument testing that was done on
prospective elementary school teachers who have not received phase transition teaching materials. The obtained data
were analyzed descriptively using the percentage technique. In general, the results show that the developed test (FTMC-
PT/five-tier multiple choice-phase transitions) is ideal for identifying students’ conceptions about phase transition.
However, further study to develop the test items and to analyze them accordingly as per the item response theory is
required.
Keywords: Five-tier test, Multiple-choice, Misconception, Prospective elementary school teachers, Science
Literacy.
1. INTRODUCTION of Caleon and Subramaniam’s three-tier test [10] that was
modified into a four-tier structure [11] for learning
In the last decades, diagnostic tests have grown mechanical waves concept. The four-tier test is a multi-
increasingly popular as a method for collecting data tiered diagnostic test. Developed a four-tier diagnostic
related to a misconception about science learning among test (Answer Tier, Confidence Rating for Answer Tier,
students and teachers. As the initiator, Treagust Reason Tier, and Confidence Rating for Reason Tier) [2].
developed a two-tier diagnostic method that explicitly Confidence Rating was added to the three-tier test and
identifies misconceptions and recommends adding a evolved into a four-tier test that increases the confidence
cause tier to determine the students’ genuine level of an answer and the explanation for the answer will
misconceptions [1]. A two-tier test takes the shape of a be more accurate. The four-tier test consists of four-level:
system (response choice plus rationale) [2]. To achieve a multiple-choice questions to test knowledge, answer
three-tier, an additional layer of Certainty of Response confidence level at the first level, answer rationale at the
Index (CRI) was proposed to supplement the limitations first level, and level of confidence (sure or unsure) of the
of the two-tier method. The three-tier test is formed as answer’s rationale at the third level [2], [9], [12–16].
answer choice plus rationale plus CRI [3–8]. Eventually,
the three-tier test evolved into a four-tier test. According The ability to recognize and manipulate concepts in
to Kaltakci-Gurel et al. [9], the four-tier test is a variation various representations is an indicator of concept
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license -http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. 131
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 633
understanding [17] because understanding the concept 2. METHODS
will be closely related to consistency in solving a problem
(question). Therefore, students that have grasped the One of the causes of poor students’ comprehension is
concept will be able to solve the problem using the same misconception. According to scientific consensus [25-
principle, despite the differences in the context and 26], misconception is a deviation from the concept of an
representation [18]. opinion. In this case, a diagnostic test is required to
There are three levels of material representation: examine misconceptions [12], [27]. The development of
macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic [19]. a multiple-choice test to assess students’ misconceptions
Differences in knowledge at the submicroscopic level can provide a significant contribution to the science
(verbal and visual) were identified in one study [20]. The teacher to incorporate research findings into their
distinction between verbal and visual aspects suggests classroom [1]. These results can be used to determine
that the submicroscopic level should be separated into whether a student has a complete understanding and to
two groups. It would be necessary given the fact that each determine the correct and incorrect scores [28].
level of representation is complimentary and connected, Experts continue to develop the multiple-choice test
and each level of representation is critical for students to model by creating the Certainty of Response Index (CRI),
understand [21–23]. which is an instrument that measures the confidence
On the phase transition topic, Johnstone [19] suggests quality of a respondent’s answer. CRI is a measure to
a submicroscopic division of verbal and visual, and the determine how definite a student’s response or answer to
use of answer rationale tier, which is a five-tier test a question [2], [3], [9], [29]. If a student correctly answers
(diagnostic test). The five-tier diagnostic test consists of a question and the CRI score is greater than 2.5, the
macroscopic level, verbal submicroscopic level, visual student is considered to have a good grasp of the concept.
submicroscopic level, symbolic level, answer confidence However, if they answer the question incorrectly and the
level. It should be noted that because a diagnostic test is CRI is greater than 2.5, the student has a misconception.
based on a conceptual approach [12], the response Also, those who make a correct or incorrect answer with
choices include some distractors resulting from students’ a CRI of less than 2.5 are categorized as do not
preconceptions. These preconceptions are obtained from understand the concept [30–34]. As shown in Table 1,
the literature and previous interview results (teachers and Table 1. Diagnostic test scoring criteria (Multiple Choice)
students) [24]. No Score Explanation
The development of a five-tier multiple-choice If the answers and the rationales are
diagnostic test to assess prospective elementary school 1 2 correct or appropriate.
teachers’ misconceptions about phase transition (FTMC-
PT) is required to be studied. This study is necessary to 2 1 If the answer is correct, the rationale is
solve learning issues and difficulties, improve student wrong, or vice versa.
comprehension, and find a solution to eliminate student 3 0 If the answer and rationale are wrong.
misconceptions.
However, FTMC-PT has not been found, and the use Kadarohman, Nahadi, and Mira [26] developed
of representations in diagnostic tests on the prospective diagnostic test criteria with two alternatives.
primary school teacher students’ understanding Based on the previous criteria, respondents with CRI
regarding phase transition has not been investigated. < 2.5 with either correct or wrong answer is categorized
Thus, this study attempts to describe a diagnostic test for as students who do not understand the concept. If those
the phase transition topic. This test is for prospective who “do not understand the concept” are given a score of
elementary school teachers in their third semester “0,” those who have “misconceptions” should be given a
assuming they had studied science throughout score below zero, such as “-1.” For conceptual
elementary and high school and had multiple science restructuring and minimizing misconceptions, ‘more
classes in the first semester. The goal of this study is to effort’ is needed than the previous teaching [33]. Based
develop a valid and accurate five-tier multiple-choice on Table 1 and the CRI criteria above, the existing
diagnostic test to assess prospective elementary school
teachers’ misconceptions about phase transition. This Table 2. Assessment criteria for each item
study is expected to improve the student’s knowledge of
educational materials as a learning reflection that may No Answer choices for each Item CRI Value Score
motivate them to take corrective measures and continue
their studies. 1 Correct > 2.5 2
2 Correct < 2.5 1
3 Wrong < 2.5 0
4 Wrong > 2.5 -1
132
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 633
Table 3. Criteria level of understanding assessment criteria were modified, which is presented in
Table 2.
No Answer options of the CRI Score There are several levels of understanding that can be
item Value categorized: categorizing the three groups of
1 All answers are > 2.5 Understand understanding: understanding the concepts,
correct misconceptions, and do not understand [26], [35], and
Wrong answer is Partial categorizing of four groups of understanding:
2 found < 2.5 misunderstanding understand, partially understand (not sure with the
answers given), misconceptions, and do not understand
3 Wrong answer is > 2.5 Partial [30], [32], understand the concepts, do not understand the
found misconception concepts, misconceptions, and errors [12], [36]. There are
All of the answers are Misconception also two sections of the five-tier diagnostic test in this
4 wrong > 2.5 study. The first section is a concept-related question
(stages 1-4), and the second section is the response
5 All answers are < 2.5 Do not certainty level using CRI for the concept-related
correct understand question. Table 3 shows the categorization of the
All of the answers are Error respondents’ levels of understanding about the question
6 wrong < 2.5 items.
Based on Tables 2, 3, and the representations that
Table 4. Five-tier test answer combination have been described previously, a combination of five-
Answer choices of each tier multiple-choice diagnostic test answers related to
phase transition can be developed as illustrated in Table
No stage Score Category 4.
I II III IV CRI Value
1 C C C C > 2.5 8 UC 2.1. Development of a five-tier test for phase
C C C W > 2.5 5 PUC transition (FTMC-PT)
C C W C > 2.5 5 PUC A five-tier multiple-choice test about phase transition
C W C C > 2.5 5 PUC (FTMC-PT) was developed in this study. This instrument
W C C C > 2.5 5 PUC had six items: question 1 was related to melting, question
C C C W < 2.5 3 PUC 2 was related to freezing, question 3 was related to
C C W C < 2.5 3 PUC vaporization, question 4 was related to condensation,
C W C C < 2.5 3 PUC question 5 was related to sublimation, and question 6 was
W C C C < 2.5 3 PUC related to deposition. The steps included designing a five-
C C W W > 2.5 2 PUC tier test instrument, validation process, instrument testing
C W W C > 2.5 2 PUC that was conducted to prospective teachers who had
2 W W C C > 2.5 2 PUC received phase transition materials, and instrument
testing that was conducted to prospective elementary
C W C W > 2.5 2 PUC school teachers who had not received phase transition
C C W W < 2.5 2 PUC materials. The instrument validity test employed a
C W W T < 2.5 2 PUC construct validity test from experts using a validation
C W C W < 2.5 2 PUC sheet. After the expert validation step was carried out, the
W W C C < 2.5 2 PUC instrument test was conducted. As per the criteria, an item
C W W W < 2.5 1 PUC is valid if r ≥ 0.3 [37] and could be considered reliable if
W W W C < 2.5 1 PUC the Cronbach’s alpha result showed a coefficient of α ≥
W C W W < 2.5 1 PUC 0.7 [38].
W W C W < 2.5 1 PUC 2.2. The subjects of the Study
C W W W > 2.5 -1 PM
W W W C > 2.5 -1 PM The subjects were 149 (116 female and 33 male
3 W C W W > 2.5 -1 PM students) prospective elementary school teachers in one
W W C W > 2.5 -1 PM of the ESTESP in West Java.
4 W W W W > 2.5 -4 M 2.3. Data Analysis
5 C C C C < 2.5 4 DUC
6 W W W W < 2.5 0 E All 149 subjects’ responses were inputted in
Microsoft Excel, then sorted and graded as shown in
133
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 633
Table 4. The data were descriptively evaluated using the misconception; (3) Question Number 3 (Vaporization)
percentage technique. has 3.36% partial misconception and 2.01%
misconception; (4) Question Number 4 (Condensation)
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS has 13.42% partial misconception and 0.67%
misconception; (5) Question Number 5 (Sublimination)
The results of the test instrument validation by 3 has 8.72% partial misconception and 2.68%
validators the average is 87.50% (very valid) and the misconception; and (6) Question Number 6 (Deposition)
reliability of the test is indicated by the Cronbach Alpha has 20.13% partial misconception and 3.36%
value = 0.774 (reliable). Some of the research results are misconception. The findings of the five-tier multiple-
shown in the following table. choice diagnostic test demonstrate that the students had
Table 5. Descriptive statistics of the test results partial misconceptions (PM) on Question 5 and
misconception (M) on Question 6. Students who were
Elements Q.1 Q.2 Q.3 Q.4 Q.5 Q.6 score Final selected were numbered 4 and 80, the result are as
score follows.
Mean 4.84 5.03 3.50 2.99 3.48 2.36 22.20 46.2525 Table 7. The percentage of understanding of prospective
Median 5.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 2 2.00 21.00 43.7500 elementary school teachers using five-tier test
Mode 5 8 5 2 2 2 27 56.25
Std. Phase UC PUC PM M DUC E Total
deviation 2.712 2.715 2.525 2.623 3.004 3.027 11.505 23.96881 Transition
Minimum -4 -1 -4 -4 -4 -4 -5 -10.42 Melting 31.54 59.06 2.68 1.34 4.70 0.67 100
Maximum 8 8 8 8 8 8 48 100 Freezing 37.58 55.70 3.36 0.00 2.01 1.34 100
Sum 721 750 522 445 518 352 3308 6891.62 Vaporization 10.74 81.21 3.36 2.01 0.67 2.01 100
Condensation 10.07 73.83 13.42 0.67 0.67 1.34 100
Table 5 above shows that the highest mean score is Sublimination 18.79 68.46 8.72 2.68 0.67 0.67 100
5.03 with a standard deviation of 2.72 on Question 2 Deposition 12.08 59.06 20.13 3.36 2.01 3.36 100
(Freezing), while the lowest average score is 2.36 with a
standard deviation of 3.03 on Question 6 (Deposition). The five-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test about
The highest possible score for all of the questions is 8. phase transition (FTMC-PT) can distinguish between
All questions have a minimum score of (-4) except prospective elementary school teachers who may
Question 2 (Freezing), which has a minimum score of (- understand the concepts, those who do not understand the
1). concepts, those who have misconceptions, errors, do not
Table 6. Correct answer percentage (Tier I - IV) and the understand and have misconceptions about some of the
confidence level of answers of the prospective concepts. According to Table 7, the first question
elementary school teachers using a five-tier test (melting) has a higher percentage of “(maybe) do not
understand the concept.” On the other hand, the sixth
Tier Q.1 Q.2 Q.3 Q.4 Q.5 Q.6 question (deposition) has the higher percentage of
I 96.6 94.6 93.3 93.3 81.2 60.4 “(maybe) error.” The fourth question (condensation) and
II 78.5 64.4 60.4 48.3 53.7 49 the sixth question (deposition) have the percentage of
III 49.7 81.9 16.1 26.8 37.6 46.3 “(maybe) have misconception” of 13.42% and 20.13%
respectively. It should be noted that misconception and
IV 76.5 63.8 77.9 63.8 72.5 52.3 partial misconception are not the same. However, if the
0 1.34 0.67 2.01 1.34 0.67 2.68 percentage is greater than 10% of the participants, it can
1 0.67 0.67 0 1.34 0.67 2.68 be considered an error [9–11].
V 2 12.8 12.8 15.4 17.4 16.1 22.1 The misconceptions that occur in prospective
3 39.6 32.9 37.6 39.6 43 38.3 elementary school teacher students include: in the event
4 28.9 32.9 29.5 27.5 26.2 22.8 of a change in the shape of the particle, it does not
5 16.8 20.1 15.4 12.8 13.4 11.4 experience movement; the motion of particles in the
Table 6 shows that, for all questions, the percentage event of freezing, evaporating, and subliming is slower,
of tier III (visual submicroscopic level knowledge) is while in the event of melting, condensing, depositing the
lower than the other tiers (I, II, and IV). In general, the motion of particles is faster; The shape and properties of
confidence level of the answers with a value of more than the particles that make up matter are the same as those of
2.5 (CRI > 2.5) is dominant in all questions. the substances they are composed of. These results are in
line with previous studies that solid particles are
From Table 7, the following information is obtained: considered to be unable to move at all and the properties
(1) Question Number 1 (Melting) has 2.68% partial of the particles that make up the substance are the same
misconception and 1.34% of misconception; (2) as the substances they are composed of, and changes in
Question Number 2 (Freezing) has 3.36% of partial form produce new substances [39]. The causes of
134
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.
